[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466252] no way to disable scim
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466252
Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution| |NOTABUG
--- Comment #6 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-10 23:51:28 EDT ---
I don't even know what happened there, but AFAICS you have changed the IM
setting before or you have had .xinputrc symlink'ed to
/etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/scim.conf anyway.
Closing now. if you see this issue again, please reopen this. thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 7 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466252] no way to disable scim
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466252
Dan Winship <dwinship(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|needinfo?(dwinship(a)redhat.c |
|om) |
--- Comment #5 from Dan Winship <dwinship(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-10 11:22:13 EDT ---
Hm... in that login session, my .xsession-errors started:
imsettings information
==========================
Is DBus enabled: yes
Is imsettings enabled: yes
Is GTK+ supported: yes
Is Qt supported: no
DESKTOP_SESSION: gnome
DISABLE_IMSETTINGS:
IMSETTINGS_DISABLE_DESKTOP_CHECK:
DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS:
unix:abstract=/tmp/dbus-bTnQMscRly,guid=f47812ddfae44c0d2b56174d48ee00a3
GTK_IM_MODULE:
QT_IM_MODULE: xim
XMODIFIERS: @im=imsettings
IMSETTINGS_MODULE: SCIM
Started SCIM
but when I logged out and back in (to try it with the latest packages), I get:
imsettings information
==========================
Is DBus enabled: yes
Is imsettings enabled: yes
Is GTK+ supported: yes
Is Qt supported: no
DESKTOP_SESSION: gnome
DISABLE_IMSETTINGS:
IMSETTINGS_DISABLE_DESKTOP_CHECK:
DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS:
unix:abstract=/tmp/dbus-Jct8g1Uv1z,guid=3e56866f27b83fb4e678ff5948ef70bb
GTK_IM_MODULE:
QT_IM_MODULE:
XMODIFIERS: @im=imsettings
IMSETTINGS_MODULE: none
(imsettings-start:3672): IMSettings-WARNING **: Failed to invoke a method
`StartIM':
No XIM server is available in none
Failed to start IM process `none'
So it seems to be working now... I don't know what was wrong before? :-/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 7 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 446800] Review Request: ebnetd - EBNET protocol server
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446800
Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC| |limb(a)jcomserv.net
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |limb(a)jcomserv.net
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> 2008-10-10 10:41:06 EDT ---
What's comment #3 about?
Anyway. . .
rpmlint on SRPM is clean.
rpmlint on RPMS:
ebhttpd.i386: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ebnetd.i386: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
ebnetd-common.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/ebnetd ebnetd
A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are:
root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator,
games, gopher, ftp, nobody.
ebnetd-common.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/ebnetd ebnetd
A file in this package is owned by a non standard group. Standard groups are:
root, bin, daemon, sys, adm, tty, disk, lp, mem, kmem, wheel, mail, news,
uucp, man, games, gopher, dip, ftp, lock, nobody, users.
ebnetd-common.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/ebnetd ebnetd
A file in this package is owned by a non standard user. Standard users are:
root, bin, daemon, adm, lp, sync, shutdown, halt, mail, news, uucp, operator,
games, gopher, ftp, nobody.
ebnetd-common.i386: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/ebnetd ebnetd
A file in this package is owned by a non standard group. Standard groups are:
root, bin, daemon, sys, adm, tty, disk, lp, mem, kmem, wheel, mail, news,
uucp, man, games, gopher, dip, ftp, lock, nobody, users.
ndtpd.i386: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
These are all fine, see above.
Otherwise, everything looks great, my only other concern after a full review is
the Conflicts: for ebhttpd. Will users expect this to be on port 80 by
default, period, full stop, or would it be feasible to set it to use something
else by default, or recommend that to users? It'd be as simple as modifying
the xinetd file. My preference would be to leave it as is, drop the
Conflicts:, but add a ebnetd-README.fedora indicating the port 80 issues and
resolutions, so that if someone wants to use this on a machine with an existing
httpd/tux/whatever, then they have that option and won't be stopped by the RPM.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 7 months