February 2009 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Dwayne Bailey <dwayne(a)translate.org.za> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwayne(a)translate.org.za --- Comment #18 from Dwayne Bailey <dwayne(a)translate.org.za> 2009-02-11 11:08:18 EDT --- Bad news from me. I had this problem, removed all the X11 fonts and things worked. A then added a number of cool fonts and bang its broken again with this error: Help! Server claimed font -misc-ar pl uming tw-light-r-normal--16-0-0-0-c-0-iso10646-1 existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing. I ran fc-cache against each directory separately but this changed nothing. How the H^ll do I know which font is breaking this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 474779] Very confusing Japanese translation

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474779 Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2009-02-11 10:36:36 EDT --- Closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484513] New: "yum update" fails on fresh f11 install due to conflict between x86_64 and i386 packages

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: "yum update" fails on fresh f11 install due to conflict between x86_64 and i386 packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484513 Summary: "yum update" fails on fresh f11 install due to conflict between x86_64 and i386 packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: alanfyoung(a)hotmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-GB; rv:1.9.1b2) Gecko/20090128 Firefox/3.1-0.4.beta2.fc11 Minefield/3.1b2 Around 16:00 UTC today I issued the "yum update" command from a terminal on a freshly-installed F11 Alpha x86_64 system. yum informed me (amongst other things) that it would be: Installing: ibus i386 1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11 rawhide 407 k replacing ibus-pinyin.noarch 0.1.1.20081004-2.fc11 ibus x86_64 1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11 rawhide 414 k replacing ibus-chewing.x86_64 0.1.1.20081023-2.fc11 However, the command later failed with 100 Transaction Check Error messages, all of them ending "conflicts between attempted installs of ibus-1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11.x86_64 and ibus-1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11.i386". Issuing the command "rm /var/cache/yum/rawhide/packages/ibus-1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11.i386.rpm" and re-running "yum update" resulted in the removed package being re-downloaded and the process failing as before. Re-issuing he command "rm /var/cache/yum/rawhide/packages/ibus-1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11.i386.rpm" and running "yum -C update" failed with the message "Error Downloading Packages: ibus-1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11.i386: Caching enabled but no local cache of //var/cache/yum/rawhide/packages/ibus-1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11.i386.rpm from rawhide". Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run "yum update" - fails as described above. 2. Run "rm /var/cache/yum/rawhide/packages/ibus-1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11.i386.rpm" 3. Run "yum update" again - this again fails as already described. 4. Re-run "rm /var/cache/yum/rawhide/packages/ibus-1.1.0.20090205-1.fc11.i386.rpm" 5. Run "yum -C update" - this too fails as described above. Actual Results: "yum update" fails to complete. Expected Results: "yum update" completes successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 2 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 484847] New: Check box (Auto start IBus on session login) is doing nothing

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Check box (Auto start IBus on session login) is doing nothing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484847 Summary: Check box (Auto start IBus on session login) is doing nothing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: while using ibus, if I select "Auto start IBus on session login" (or unselect), it has no effect even if I logout and login Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-0.1.1.20081023-3.fc11 How reproducible: everytime if select or unselcet option Steps to Reproduce: 1. start ibus, 2. open pref (by Right Click on icon) 3. select/unselect "Auto start IBus on session login" Actual results: ibus started even if option selected Expected results: If unselect, ibus should not start Additional info: Is im-chooser preference override this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 2 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466852] New: [RFE] ibus should provide default IME for language when available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [RFE] ibus should provide default IME for language when available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466852 Summary: [RFE] ibus should provide default IME for language when available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: FutureFeature, i18n Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ibus AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: For users coming from SCIM it is confusing not to have a default IME set for their language. ibus should default to an IME for the current locale if available and it should be possible to configure a system default IME per language. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Japanese user starts using ibus and presses Ctrl+Space Actual results: ibus shows bubble asking user to configure Expected results: ibus-anthy to be activated if installed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 2 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480719] New: [RFE] Expand ibus toolbar left

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [RFE] Expand ibus toolbar left https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480719 Summary: [RFE] Expand ibus toolbar left Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: ivazqueznet(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora It would be nice if the ibus toolbar had the ability to expand to the left instead of the right when the IM is changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 2 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 466232] New: Candidate window doesn't make candidates in a loop

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Candidate window doesn't make candidates in a loop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466232 Summary: Candidate window doesn't make candidates in a loop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: ibus AssignedTo: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When the last candidate is selected and move to the next one, ibus doesn't go back to the top of candidate. this is a feature regression from scim and also an usability issue. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-0.1.1.20081006-3.fc10 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.run gedit with LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8 say 2.press ctrl+space and type something and space. 3.continue to press space key until move the selection to the end of candidate and press space once again. Actual results: no change of the position to be selected the candidate Expected results: should goes back to the top of the candidate. Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 2 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] allow wqy-zenhei-fonts to be installed by default in @chinese-support group

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459 --- Comment #9 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-10 14:34:49 EDT --- here I have a problem: in 44-wqy-zenhei.conf, I used alias sections to set the preferences, I remember this is the recommended way of setting the priorities, however, if I want to use lang tags, I may have to write this whole section using match and prepend, or kill the whole section. Jens, is this what you want to do? ---------------------------------------------------- <alias> <family>serif</family> <prefer> <family>Bitstream Vera Serif</family> <family>DejaVu Serif</family> <family>WenQuanYi Zen Hei</family> </prefer> </alias> <alias> <family>sans-serif</family> <prefer> <family>Bitstream Vera Sans</family> <family>DejaVu Sans</family> <family>WenQuanYi Zen Hei</family> </prefer> </alias> <alias> <family>monospace</family> <prefer> <family>Bitstream Vera Sans Mono</family> <family>DejaVu Sans Mono</family> <family>WenQuanYi Zen Hei Mono</family> </prefer> </alias> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 195437] JIS X 0213:2004 Anthy Dictionary Coverage (Input Method)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195437 Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-10 07:27:16 EDT --- anthy-9100h-1.fc9 and anthy-9100h-1.fc10 is in testing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477479] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477479 Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: VLGothic-fonts AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or several font files: repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb' -f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e 's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq Unfortunately the script does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can close this bug report now. Otherwise, you should know that: - Fedora guidelines demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font... - our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel package. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts Please make your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide. If your package is not principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed in the correct fontconfig directories. It is preferred to make a font package or subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a font family is given on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family The new templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe. The following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: - andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts - dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts - gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts - gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts - gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts - gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts - gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts - gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts If you have any remaining questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

15 years, 2 months

1
15
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs February 2009