[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 445796] Doesn't install anything despite prompt
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445796
--- Comment #14 from Tim Waugh <twaugh(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-04 06:21:12 EDT ---
Well, it isn't working because I get prompted but no packages are installed as
a result.
Here's how to install a package using PackageKit from Python:
bus = dbus.SessionBus ()
obj = bus.get_object ("org.freedesktop.PackageKit",
"/org/freedesktop/PackageKit")
proxy = dbus.Interface (obj, "org.freedesktop.PackageKit")
proxy.InstallPackageName (...)
(See installpackage.py from system-config-printer for a real example, although
that has compatibility code for an older interface as well.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 2 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 445796] Doesn't install anything despite prompt
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445796
Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from Pravin Satpute <psatpute(a)redhat.com> 2009-02-04 04:35:39 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> If the user is prompted, packages should be installed.
>
> Conversely, if there are no packages to be installed (as in this case), the user
> *should not* be prompted.
sorry for late reply
i was working on some others bug of s-c-l so looks for this too
It is prompting for
"XX language support is not installed, do you want to install it?"
and it is installing language support at the end
(It is not prompting for package installation)
also as per bug
looks like adding extra overhead by checking using yum where packages are going
to install or not before user wish
as per suggestion s-c-l need to do all yum calculation, dependency check before
actually need of it, which is big task
so IMHO what is happening is correct
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 2 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764
Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|panemade(a)gmail.com |
AssignedTo|panemade(a)gmail.com |nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Flag|fedora-review? |
--- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade(a)gmail.com> 2009-02-03 09:36:48 EDT ---
Almost more than one month no response from package maintainer. And looks like
I also lost now interest in this package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 2 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 480889] New: ibus should not define Next engine hotkey by default for all users
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ibus should not define Next engine hotkey by default for all users
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480889
Summary: ibus should not define Next engine hotkey by default
for all users
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: wtogami(a)redhat.com, phuang(a)redhat.com,
fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 446451
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
ibus defines hotkeys for Next engine (and Previous engine), which can easily be
triggered by mistake. I suggest doing the same as we did for scim and only
enabling it by default on Chinese desktop.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 2 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 481093] New: ibus causes pidgin to crash
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ibus causes pidgin to crash
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481093
Summary: ibus causes pidgin to crash
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: wtogami(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
ibus-0.1.1.20081023-2.fc10.x86_64
ibus-anthy-0.1.1.20080912-1.fc10.x86_64
pidgin-2.5.4-1.fc10.x86_64
LANG=en_US.utf8
ibus IM causes pidgin to occasionally crash. Happens unpredictably it is
difficult to reproduce on demand. We need good reports with full debuginfo
crash dumps and what you were doing at the time of the crash.
debuginfo-install pidgin ibus bug-buddy
http://people.redhat.com/wtogami/temp/pidgin-bugreport.txt
Here is an incomplete crash dump. Sadly I did not have ibus*debuginfo
installed at the time. Will have more complete dumps later.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 2 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 477465] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477465
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: thaifonts-scalable
AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 2 months