[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459
--- Comment #32 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2009-05-12 00:55:36 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> I don't think so. I am not saying this must be included in fontconfig upstream
> (which get updated slowly), we can certainly create a new package which only
> include these CJK specific config files. Even fontconfig have similar files, we
> can still ship something to override if it gets updated. But the key idea is
> not to let individual font to do this. Functional-wise, they are completely
> equivalent.
I have never been saying about fontconfig upstream but the centralized
management is painful to maintain.
> Either way does not prevent people from customizing their own list. As I said,
> they are simply equivalent.
Sure. so how is it better than applying it with the package installation then?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 12 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 476459] wqy-zenhei-fonts overrides Japanese desktop (so can't be installed by default in @chinese-support group)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476459
--- Comment #31 from Qianqian Fang <fangqq(a)gmail.com> 2009-05-12 00:32:42 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> that idea is hard to maintain the rule. as you are aware, even current rule is
> outdated. maintaining it in the font packages with the accurate policy would
> rather be better than centralized management.
I don't think so. I am not saying this must be included in fontconfig upstream
(which get updated slowly), we can certainly create a new package which only
include these CJK specific config files. Even fontconfig have similar files, we
can still ship something to override if it gets updated. But the key idea is
not to let individual font to do this. Functional-wise, they are completely
equivalent.
> aside from that, it just reflects
> your favorite someone may not likes. one could do modify it any time, but it
> may breaks after updating or causes the unwanted file creation on the packaging
> management system. applying the necessary rules with installing the package
> would be easier and intuitive.
Either way does not prevent people from customizing their own list. As I said,
they are simply equivalent.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 12 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 499533] New: [Indic] ibus should allow input in KDE using all supported Indic locales
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [Indic] ibus should allow input in KDE using all supported Indic locales
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499533
Summary: [Indic] ibus should allow input in KDE using all
supported Indic locales
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
Found that unable to input in sd_IN or mai_IN in kate. When I tried to input in
recently added new Indic locales in KDE, I cannot see ibus getting initiated.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ibus-1.1.0.20090423-1.fc11.x86_64
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Either start KDE in Maithili or use LANG=mai_IN.UTF-8 kate
2. try to start/input in maithili
3.
Actual results:
unable to see ibus panel
Expected results:
should start ibus and show ibus panel
Additional info:
Following is list of Indic locales.
ar, as, bn, bo, en, gu, hi, hne, kn, ks, mai, ml, mr, or, pa, sa, sd, ta, te,
Please add support for all above locales in ibus
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 12 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 498352] New: hotkey config table should list keys in same order as on main setup page
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: hotkey config table should list keys in same order as on main setup page
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498352
Summary: hotkey config table should list keys in same order as
on main setup page
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
Hotkey config dialog lists the hotkeys in reverse order to what is shown on the
main page: this is confusing.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. ibus-setup
2. look at hotkeys shown
3. go to hotkey config
Actual results:
2. Control+Space; Zenkaku_Hankaku; ...
3. List ends in Control+Space with Alt+Release+Alt_R shown first.
Expected results:
same order for 2 and 3 with Control+Space shown first.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 12 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 499663] New: Includes/Provides directory it MUST NOT
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Includes/Provides directory it MUST NOT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499663
Summary: Includes/Provides directory it MUST NOT
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: anthy
AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
$ rpmls -p anthy-devel-9100h-2.fc11.i586.rpm|grep pkg|grep ^d
drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/pkgconfig
Your package must not include this directory, because this directory belongs
into the pkgconfig package(s). This hides broken dependencies in other
packages, which expect to pull in pkgconfig by depending on
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig.
Note: I haven't checked whether the ownership of directories other than
%_libdir/pkgconfig is correct.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 12 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 498541] New: ibus-libs should not contain devel file libibus.so
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ibus-libs should not contain devel file libibus.so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498541
Summary: ibus-libs should not contain devel file libibus.so
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ibus
AssignedTo: phuang(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
libibus.so is owned by both ibus-libs and ibus-devel: it should only be owned
by ibus-devel.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 12 months