[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 551476] New: an obsolete option '+' is described in the Japanese man page of the tail command
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: an obsolete option '+' is described in the Japanese man page of the tail command
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551476
Summary: an obsolete option '+' is described in the Japanese
man page of the tail command
Product: Fedora
Version: 12
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: man-pages-ja
AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: jbastian(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Clone Of: 551471
Description of problem:
The Japanese tail(1) man page still includes a description for the obsolete
'+N' option to start tail'ing the file on line N. Older versions of tail
allowed you to run
tail +5 file.txt
to start reading file.txt on line 5. This is ambiguous and obsolete and has
been replaced with the -n option:
tail -n +5 file.txt
The English man page has a section describing how this is obsolete:
'_POSIX2_VERSION' COMPATIBILITY ISSUES:
On older systems, the leading '-' can be replaced by '+' in the obso-
lete option syntax with the same meaning as in counts, and obsolete
usage overrides normal usage when the two conflict. ...
However, the Japanese man page indicates this is still valid:
書式
tail [<-|+>COUNTOPTIONS] ...
...
オプション
<-|+>COUNTOPTIONS
このオプションは最初に指定した場合に限って認識される。 COUNT は
10 進数の数値。単位を表す文字 (‘b’, ‘k’, ‘m’) を後置したり (それ
ぞれの意味は ‘-c’ のものと同じ)、行単位のカウントを指定する ‘l’
を 後置したり、他のオプション文字 (‘cqv’) を後置したりできる。何
も文字が後置されなかった場合は ‘l’ が指定されたのと同じことに な
る。短いオプション形式 - と + は推奨されない。
Please update the Japanese tail(1) man page to indicate the '+N' syntax is
obsolete.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
man-pages-ja-20060815-11.el5.noarch
How reproducible:
every time
Steps to Reproduce:
1. export LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8
2. man 1 tail
Actual results:
man page indicates 'tail +N' is valid syntax
Expected results:
should instead describe 'tail -n +N'
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 5 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 556034] New: Canna : does not adhere to Static Library Packaging Guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Canna : does not adhere to Static Library Packaging Guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=556034
Summary: Canna : does not adhere to Static Library Packaging
Guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: Canna
AssignedTo: tagoh(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mschwendt(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
The package is in need of an update because it does not adhere to
the guidelines for packaging static libraries:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libra...
The -devel package contains both the shared and the static build of
a library. That makes it possible to link statically with the -devel
package as a build requirement instead of having to build-require a
special-purpose -static subpackage.
Correct would be to either disable/delete the static libraries at
build-time, or to %exclude them in the %files section, or to split off
a -static subpackage (if there is a compelling reason as why the static
libs should be made available).
Please consult the guidelines for the details.
[...]
Canna-devel
/usr/lib/libRKC.so <=> /usr/lib/libRKC.a
/usr/lib/libRKC16.so <=> /usr/lib/libRKC16.a
/usr/lib/libcanna.so <=> /usr/lib/libcanna.a
/usr/lib/libcanna16.so <=> /usr/lib/libcanna16.a
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 5 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 555699] New: multiple entry selected in ibus-anthy candidate list
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: multiple entry selected in ibus-anthy candidate list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555699
Summary: multiple entry selected in ibus-anthy candidate list
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: ibus-anthy
AssignedTo: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tagoh(a)redhat.com, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com,
phuang(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Created an attachment (id=384541)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=384541)
screenshot when anthy shows kanji candidate
Description of problem:
When I
- lauch firefox, see http://www.google.co.jp/firefox/, for example
- In the place to enter keyword for search, press Zenkaku/Hankaku key
to enable ibus
- Type "kannji", for example
- press space to see kanji candidate list
Then anthy seems to be showing that multiple candidate
are selected (see screenshot)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ibus-1.2.0.20100111-1.fc13.i686
ibus-anthy-1.2.0.20100115-1.fc13.i686
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. See above
2.
3.
Actual results:
See the attached screenshot
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 5 months
[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 547974] Review Request: ibus-skk - Japanese Simple Kana Kanji IME for ibus
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547974
Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> 2010-01-16 09:47:17 EST ---
For 0.0.4-1:
* BR (BuildRequires)
- Please check if "BR: gettext-devel" is really needed
(I guess "BR: gettext" is sufficient)
* BuildArch
- This package is noarch (i.e. add "BuildArch: noarch")
* %changelog
- It is recommend to insert one line between each %changelog
entry (as it is useful when using Fedora CVS) like:
--------------------------------------------------------------
%changelog
* Mon Jan 11 2010 Daiki Ueno <ueno(a)unixuser.org> - 0.0.4-1
- current version
* Thu Dec 24 2009 Daiki Ueno <ueno(a)unixuser.org> - 0.0.2-1
- new upstream release
* Fri Dec 11 2009 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> - 0.0.1-1
- initial packaging for fedora
--------------------------------------------------------------
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
14 years, 5 months