April 2010 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 569352] Broken dependencies for 1:openoffice.org-langpack-en-3.2.0-12.7.fc13.x86_64

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569352 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |yum-langpacks-0.1.5-1.fc13 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 569352] Broken dependencies for 1:openoffice.org-langpack-en-3.2.0-12.7.fc13.x86_64

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569352 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2010-04-16 19:50:59 EDT --- yum-langpacks-0.1.5-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 573209] Error update after all dependencies passed

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573209 seth vidal <svidal(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje | |ct.org, | |petersen(a)redhat.com, | |svidal(a)redhat.com Component|yum |yum-langpacks AssignedTo|skvidal(a)sethdot.org |petersen(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 582894] Review Request: emacs-common-ddskk - Daredevil SKK - Simple Kana to Kanji conversion program for Emacs

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582894 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproje | |ct.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 532624] New: build ddskk-xemacs again

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: build ddskk-xemacs again https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532624 Summary: build ddskk-xemacs again Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ddskk AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, loganjerry(a)gmail.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #503185 +++ Unfortunately the xemacs part of the build has been breaking fedora builds of ddskk for a long time now - I guess I should just disable xemacs-ddskk for now... --- Additional comment from petersen(a)redhat.com on 2009-06-22 02:11:42 EDT --- ddskk should also be renamed to emacs-ddskk or emacs-common-ddskk, which probably needs a new package review... I don't suppose you are interested in maintaining it for fedora, Yamato-san? :) --- Additional comment from petersen(a)redhat.com on 2009-06-22 02:45:48 EDT --- > Unfortunately the xemacs part of the build has been breaking fedora builds of > ddskk for a long time now Ok, I was confused and thinking about ddskk-13.1 I haven't been able to build yet successfully for fedora. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1428775 I'll backport this to f11 and f10. --- Additional comment from updates(a)fedoraproject.org on 2009-06-22 02:57:40 EDT --- ddskk-12.2.0-13.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ddskk-12.2.0-13.fc11 --- Additional comment from petersen(a)redhat.com on 2009-06-22 04:08:07 EDT --- > Ok, I was confused and thinking about ddskk-13.1 I haven't been able to build > yet successfully for fedora. Nevermind, I finally built ddskk-13.1 for rawhide but had to drop xemacs since it is still on apel-10.6. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1428851 --- Additional comment from ville.skytta(a)iki.fi on 2009-06-22 10:35:31 EDT --- (Changing Cc to current Fedora XEmacs maintainer.) --- Additional comment from loganjerry(a)gmail.com on 2009-06-22 12:45:11 EDT --- I will take a look at upgrading XEmacs to apel 10.7. --- Additional comment from updates(a)fedoraproject.org on 2009-06-24 15:42:33 EDT --- ddskk-12.2.0-13.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. --- Additional comment from updates(a)fedoraproject.org on 2009-07-03 15:36:25 EDT --- ddskk-12.2.0-13.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. --- Additional comment from loganjerry(a)gmail.com on 2009-10-28 13:34:47 EDT --- XEmacs has apel 10.7 in F-11+ now, if that matters. I'm willing to help with any further problems. --- Additional comment from petersen(a)redhat.com on 2009-10-29 03:56:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > XEmacs has apel 10.7 in F-11+ now, if that matters. Thanks - good to know, but xemacs-packages-extra.spec still provides apel-xemacs = 10.6-6. Also build still fails after that: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1775997&name=build.log --- Additional comment from petersen(a)redhat.com on 2009-10-29 04:11:03 EDT --- more info on the failed build if it helps: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1775997 --- Additional comment from loganjerry(a)gmail.com on 2009-10-29 10:51:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Thanks - good to know, but xemacs-packages-extra.spec still > provides apel-xemacs = 10.6-6. Oops. I've got a font bugfix coming, so I'll fix this at the same time. > Also build still fails after that: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1775997&name=build.log Okay, I'll take a look. Thanks for trying. --- Additional comment from loganjerry(a)gmail.com on 2009-10-29 12:19:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366657) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366657) Patch to support building with XEmacs This patch makes a couple of path changes in SKK-CFG for XEmacs. --- Additional comment from loganjerry(a)gmail.com on 2009-10-29 12:20:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=366658) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=366658) Source patch for XEmacs This patch changes two instances of a character defined using the Emacs-only syntax ?\xABC into the syntax ?\uABCD, which is supported by both Emacs and XEmacs. --- Additional comment from updates(a)fedoraproject.org on 2009-10-29 16:28:36 EDT --- xemacs-packages-extra-20090217-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xemacs-packages-extra-20090217-3.fc11 --- Additional comment from loganjerry(a)gmail.com on 2009-10-29 16:30:39 EDT --- I've pushed new builds into F-11, F-12, and devel that fix the apel-xemacs provides. I've submitted F-11 to testing and requested that the F-12 build be tagged into f12-final. That plus the patches in comment 16 and comment 17 fix everything for me. Let me know if there is anything else I can do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 1 month

1
4
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 531688] New: ddskk should be renamed to emacs-common-ddskk

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: ddskk should be renamed to emacs-common-ddskk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531688 Summary: ddskk should be renamed to emacs-common-ddskk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ddskk AssignedTo: petersen(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: ddskk needs to be updated to follow the Emacs Packaging Guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 1 month

1
8
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 569366] Review Request: ipa-ex-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569366 --- Comment #4 from Daiki Ueno <dueno(a)redhat.com> 2010-04-16 00:37:53 EDT --- Sorry, one more thing. ipa-ex-gothic-fonts-fontconfig.conf contains 'binding="same"' of which Tagoh-san is proposing removal (see 578021 or other similar bugs). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 575005] Review Request: zinnia-tomoe - Online hand recognition system with machine learning

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575005 --- Comment #28 from Chen Lei <supercyper(a)163.com> 2010-04-15 05:56:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #26) > > (In reply to comment #25) > > > Can't we just make the package arch and put the datafiles under libdir for now? > > > > I already solved this issues by split this package to two noarch subpackage - > > zinnia-tomoe-el and zinnia-tomoe-eb. But ibus-handwrite don't depend on this > > package now. So I don't know if we are worth to do so. > Hello Chen Lei, > Where can I find your package for zinnia-tomoe-el and zinnia-tomoe-eb? > And how could I compile these noarch packages on koji from textual model file > model.txt? Since ibus-handwrite don't require zinnia anymore, would you still want to import this package into repo? See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Zinnia-tomoe-el and zinnia-tomoe-eb subpackages can be built easily. Using %ifarch %{ix86} x86_64 arm5tel for zinnia-tomoe-el and %else for zinnia-tomoe-eb Note: 1.zinnia-tomoe-el should conflict with zinnia-tomoe-eb. 2.adding noarch for subpackges, not for zinnia-tomoe -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 569366] Review Request: ipa-ex-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569366 Daiki Ueno <dueno(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Daiki Ueno <dueno(a)redhat.com> 2010-04-15 03:04:18 EDT --- It looks fine except that /usr/share/doc/.../Readme_ipaexg00101.txt is not in UTF-8 (Shift_JIS). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 575005] Review Request: zinnia-tomoe - Online hand recognition system with machine learning

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575005 --- Comment #27 from Peng Wu <pwu(a)redhat.com> 2010-04-15 02:49:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > (In reply to comment #25) > > Can't we just make the package arch and put the datafiles under libdir for now? > > I already solved this issues by split this package to two noarch subpackage - > zinnia-tomoe-el and zinnia-tomoe-eb. But ibus-handwrite don't depend on this > package now. So I don't know if we are worth to do so. Hello Chen Lei, Where can I find your package for zinnia-tomoe-el and zinnia-tomoe-eb? And how could I compile these noarch packages on koji from textual model file model.txt? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs April 2010