May 2010 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 --- Comment #19 from Parag <pnemade(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-18 01:20:32 EDT --- Thanks for the review! here is updated package. SPEC:http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/iso8859-2-fonts.spec SRPM:http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/iso8859-2-fonts-1.0... Scratch build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2193389 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 575005] Review Request: zinnia-tomoe - Online hand recognition system with machine learning

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575005 --- Comment #52 from Chen Lei <supercyper1(a)gmail.com> 2010-05-17 22:16:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #51) > Probably we still need a package to include zinnia format data files converted > from tomoe. It could be a new package zinnia-tomoe or in zinnia self. I think we can merge those data to zinnia or ibus-handwrite as a subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 575005] Review Request: zinnia-tomoe - Online hand recognition system with machine learning

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575005 --- Comment #51 from Peng Huang <phuang(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-17 21:56:04 EDT --- Probably we still need a package to include zinnia format data files converted from tomoe. It could be a new package zinnia-tomoe or in zinnia self. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Chen Lei <supercyper1(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 575005] Review Request: zinnia-tomoe - Online hand recognition system with machine learning

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575005 Chen Lei <supercyper1(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Blocks|570731 | Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #50 from Chen Lei <supercyper1(a)gmail.com> 2010-05-17 09:23:10 EDT --- I find that this package is not need now. We already have handwriting-ja.xml and handwriting-zh_CN.xml in fedora and can be used to generate model files. See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1442023 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 570731] Review Request: ibus-handwrite - IBus handwrite project

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570731 Chen Lei <supercyper1(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|575005 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 569366] Review Request: ipa-ex-gothic-fonts - Japanese Gothic-typeface OpenType font by IPA

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569366 --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-17 07:16:00 EDT --- Okay, another try: Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-ex-gothic-fonts/ipa-ex-gothic-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-ex-gothic-fonts/ipa-ex-gothic-fonts-001... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 569368] Review Request: ipa-ex-mincho-fonts - Japanese Mincho-typeface OpenType font by IPA

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569368 --- Comment #5 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-17 06:01:30 EDT --- Sorry for not getting back to you earlier. updated spec file and srpm is available here: Spec URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-ex-mincho-fonts/ipa-ex-mincho-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/ipa-ex-mincho-fonts/ipa-ex-mincho-fonts-001... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-17 04:15:26 EDT --- Review results: + rpmlint result: ISO8859-2-100dpi-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) dpi -> dip, pi, dpt ISO8859-2-100dpi-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dpi -> dip, pi, dpt ISO8859-2-100dpi-fonts.noarch: W: no-url-tag ISO8859-2-100dpi-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation ISO8859-2-75dpi-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) dpi -> dip, pi, dpt ISO8859-2-75dpi-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dpi -> dip, pi, dpt ISO8859-2-75dpi-fonts.noarch: W: no-url-tag ISO8859-2-75dpi-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation ISO8859-2-fonts.src: W: no-url-tag ISO8859-2-fonts.src: W: invalid-url Source0: ISO8859-2-bdf.tar.gz ISO8859-2-fonts-common.noarch: W: no-url-tag ISO8859-2-misc-fonts.noarch: W: no-url-tag ISO8859-2-misc-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings. + the package met the Packaging Naming Guidelines. + the spec file name matches the base package %{name}. + the package met the Packaging Guidelines. + the license is OSS-compatible. + License tag matches the actual license. _ no license file provided by upstream. + the spec file is written in American English. + the spec file is legible. _ according to the comment in the spec file, the upstream link is dead. + the package is buildable on mock. + the package provides noarch only. + the package has the certain BuildRequires. _ no locales files provided. _ no shared libraries provided. + the package owns all directories in the package without duplicates. + no duplicates in %files. + files in the package has certain permissions. + the package consistently use macros. + the package contains permissable content. _ no large documentation files provided. + %doc contains the release notes only. _ no header files provided. _ no static libraries provided. _ no desktop files provided. + all filenames in rpm is valid UTF-8. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764 Parag <pnemade(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(pnemade(a)redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #17 from Parag <pnemade(a)redhat.com> 2010-05-16 23:48:46 EDT --- updated package SPEC:- http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/ISO8859-2-fonts.spec SRPM:- http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/ISO8859-2-fonts-1.0-24.f... Scratch build -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2191463 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

14 years

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs May 2010