July 2013 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 988687] Merge review: skkdic - Dictionaries for SKK (Simple Kana-Kanji conversion program)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988687 Daiki Ueno <dueno(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ Last Closed| |2013-07-26 04:15:14 --- Comment #1 from Daiki Ueno <dueno(a)redhat.com> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package do not use a name that already exist Note: A package already exist with this name, please check https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/skkdic See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Conflicting_Pac... ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: %defattr present but not needed [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. [x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Note: Documentation size is 256000 bytes in 5 files. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: Uses parallel make. [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: skkdic-20130104-5.T1435.fc20.noarch.rpm skkdic.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pubdic -> pubic, public 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint skkdic skkdic.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pubdic -> pubic, public 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- skkdic (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- skkdic: skkdic Source checksums ---------------- Using local file /home/ueno/cvs/skkdic/skkdic-20130104T1435.tar.bz2 as upstream file:///home/ueno/cvs/skkdic/skkdic-20130104T1435.tar.bz2 : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 09fc9d35a0ee354e123581221692f17ab8a92977dcd7fbcd51af6c8d3ac7625a CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 09fc9d35a0ee354e123581221692f17ab8a92977dcd7fbcd51af6c8d3ac7625a http://openlab.ring.gr.jp/skk/skk/tools/unannotation.awk : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 207969e84174aece01955fa6c9381e5414c52c09829ce9407f6b9f97522c2745 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 207969e84174aece01955fa6c9381e5414c52c09829ce9407f6b9f97522c2745 Using local file /home/ueno/cvs/skkdic/create-skkdic-source.sh as upstream file:///home/ueno/cvs/skkdic/create-skkdic-source.sh : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 0337142d205873a77a12dc5f0671e82edacc0435a3b60330f648b84d5f0d15e1 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 0337142d205873a77a12dc5f0671e82edacc0435a3b60330f648b84d5f0d15e1 Using local file /home/ueno/cvs/skkdic/README-skkdic.rh.ja as upstream file:///home/ueno/cvs/skkdic/README-skkdic.rh.ja : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 6a8cfc3249680034b9b549042bed348e6d460783c4f66290e1cb02b3a45226dc CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 6a8cfc3249680034b9b549042bed348e6d460783c4f66290e1cb02b3a45226dc Generated by fedora-review 0.4.1 (b2e211f) last change: 2013-04-29 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -n skkdic Thanks for filing. Looks good to me. It would be nice to fix the wrong changelog dates some day. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=T0O5mAnX4W&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 988687] Merge review: skkdic - Dictionaries for SKK (Simple Kana-Kanji conversion program)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988687 Daiki Ueno <dueno(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |dueno(a)redhat.com Flags| |fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ml8NeQ4PET&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 987222] No Norwegian keyboard layouts in ibus-setup.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987222 --- Comment #6 from fropeter(a)online.no --- (In reply to fujiwara from comment #4) > Now I integrated the "no" layout engines without "nodeadkeys": > https://github.com/ibus/ibus/commit/bc2d0010ed29cb85e5507f2d91488bf1afab102c Thank you for fixing this! It works fine now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Sn4uclVAYl&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 988687] Merge review: skkdic - Dictionaries for SKK (Simple Kana-Kanji conversion program)

by Red Hat Bugzilla

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 987222] No Norwegian keyboard layouts in ibus-setup.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987222 fujiwara <tfujiwar(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Possible security issue in |No Norwegian keyboard |Fedora 19/Mate using ibus |layouts in ibus-setup. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CBLPyzOmXk&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 987222] Possible security issue in Fedora 19/Mate using ibus

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987222 fujiwara <tfujiwar(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|high |medium --- Comment #5 from fujiwara <tfujiwar(a)redhat.com> --- The preedit on terminal issue is not new so changed the severity. I will fix this issue adding "no" layouts. The preedit issue is already filed in bug 803646. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=0RLBfpJ5AI&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 987222] Possible security issue in Fedora 19/Mate using ibus

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987222 fujiwara <tfujiwar(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST --- Comment #4 from fujiwara <tfujiwar(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to fropeter from comment #2) > (In reply to fujiwara from comment #1) > > > Probably I think you wish to use no keyboard layout with ibus. > > Do you mean the layout named 'no' or 'do not use a keyboard layout with > ibus', i.e. ibus is inactive? I meant Norwegian keyboard layout. I forgot to quote "no". > Ideally I would like the keyboard layout to represent the physical keyboard > on the computer I'm using, with no regard to language. Then the ibus hotkey > selections (preferably for the current window) could be 'Japanese' and > 'direct input', and direct input to be the keyboard layout that I selected > in the mate settings. You can configure the "no" layout in ibus-setup as 'direct input'. Now ibus puts the keyboard engines and input method engines within the ibus icon menu in panel and the same shortcut keys to switch the engines. So you can switch "no", "us" and Japanese input method with Super+space. If you wish to use XKB group layouts and XKB option keys instead of ibus short cut keys, basically I don't suppose that usage but ibus-setup provides the option "Use system layout" in "Advanced" tab and ibus-setup-kkc provides another shortcut key to enable/disable input method. > > Your "Norwegian nb-NO" might be chosen from ibus-m17n or ibus-typing-booster > > and they are input methods. > > Now ibus provides the keyboard layouts and input methods. > > I'm not sure I understand exactly what the input method adds in the case of > using a localized keyboard with a the writing system it is designed for. It > makes sense to me when the the letters on the keyboard do not match what is > to be produced, e.g. Japanese text/latin keyboard. Is this just a matter of > a missing configuration in the case of my language? Now ibus supposes to configure your physical layout as a keyboard layout engine. Fedora ibus provides "Customize active input methods" in ibus-setup. If the option is disabled, ibus-daemon will load the session XKB as keyboard layout engines automatically. > This worked, although the eliminate dead keys part doesn't. I want the dead > keys, so I'm fine with that, but if this is going into a proper fix, then it > probably should be corrected. And then I would need a section without the > 'eliminate dead keys' part. :) OK, I asked it because you noted "_NOT_ the dead keys" below. (In reply to fropeter from comment #0) > 2. set up input method to include Norwegian nb-NO (_NOT_ the dead keys Now I integrated the "no" layout engines without "nodeadkeys": https://github.com/ibus/ibus/commit/bc2d0010ed29cb85e5507f2d91488bf1afab102c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=mdGErecADa&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 987222] Possible security issue in Fedora 19/Mate using ibus

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987222 --- Comment #3 from fropeter(a)online.no --- # setxkbmap -query rules: evdev model: thinkpad60 layout: no,us variant: , options: terminate:ctrl_alt_bksp # -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gRb7ZZPcEn&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 987222] Possible security issue in Fedora 19/Mate using ibus

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987222 fropeter(a)online.no changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(fropeter(a)online.n | |o) | --- Comment #2 from fropeter(a)online.no --- (In reply to fujiwara from comment #1) > Probably I think you wish to use no keyboard layout with ibus. Do you mean the layout named 'no' or 'do not use a keyboard layout with ibus', i.e. ibus is inactive? Ideally I would like the keyboard layout to represent the physical keyboard on the computer I'm using, with no regard to language. Then the ibus hotkey selections (preferably for the current window) could be 'Japanese' and 'direct input', and direct input to be the keyboard layout that I selected in the mate settings. > Your "Norwegian nb-NO" might be chosen from ibus-m17n or ibus-typing-booster > and they are input methods. > Now ibus provides the keyboard layouts and input methods. I'm not sure I understand exactly what the input method adds in the case of using a localized keyboard with a the writing system it is designed for. It makes sense to me when the the letters on the keyboard do not match what is to be produced, e.g. Japanese text/latin keyboard. Is this just a matter of a missing configuration in the case of my language? > Could you insert the following lines in /usr/share/ibus/component/simple.xml > by manual and restart ibus-daemon? > And ibus-setup will show the "Norwegian (eliminate dead keys)" keymap. This worked, although the eliminate dead keys part doesn't. I want the dead keys, so I'm fine with that, but if this is going into a proper fix, then it probably should be corrected. And then I would need a section without the 'eliminate dead keys' part. :) > I'm not sure if the nodeadkeys variant is often used. I don't know, but I think foreign language use is high, so I think the other option is more important. I think a lot of users don't know what they are, so they avoid selecting the nodeadkeys option. Thanks for the workaround. PS > You could disable ibus and check the current layout with setxkbmap command: > % setxkbmap -query > layout: no I'll paste the output of this in another comment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=91bLLo4VBN&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 845984] ghostscript 9.05 does not show some Postscript files in /usr/shar/doc

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845984 Tim Waugh <twaugh(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed|2012-08-06 11:05:34 |2013-07-25 04:48:11 --- Comment #9 from Tim Waugh <twaugh(a)redhat.com> --- Seems to work fine on Fedora 19.pagul-fonts-1.0-5.fc19.noarch ghostscript-9.07-10.fc19.x86_64 I'm starting to think this is the same as bug #969660. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 969660 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=OYKcloF5O8&a=cc_unsubscribe

10 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs July 2013