August 2015 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1182536] New: [abrt] fcitx-configtool: g_malloc0(): fcitx-config-gtk3 killed by SIGSEGV

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182536 Bug ID: 1182536 Summary: [abrt] fcitx-configtool: g_malloc0(): fcitx-config-gtk3 killed by SIGSEGV Product: Fedora Version: 21 Component: fcitx-configtool Assignee: liangsuilong(a)gmail.com Reporter: gzjboy(a)163.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, liangsuilong(a)gmail.com, robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com Version-Release number of selected component: fcitx-configtool-0.4.7-4.fc21 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.3.0 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: fcitx-config-gtk3 '' crash_function: g_malloc0 executable: /usr/bin/fcitx-config-gtk3 kernel: 3.17.8-300.fc21.x86_64 runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (10 frames) #3 g_malloc0 at gmem.c:127 #4 _gtk_css_lookup_new at gtkcsslookup.c:33 #5 build_properties at gtkstylecontext.c:767 #6 style_values_lookup at gtkstylecontext.c:813 #7 _gtk_style_context_validate at gtkstylecontext.c:3060 #13 gtk_container_idle_sizer at gtkcontainer.c:1738 #14 _g_closure_invoke_va at gclosure.c:831 #16 g_signal_emit_by_name at gsignal.c:3405 #17 gdk_frame_clock_paint_idle at gdkframeclockidle.c:408 #23 g_main_context_iteration at gmain.c:3842 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=lfoIuJJgHp&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 6 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1016989] New: [ml_IN] non-standard sequence sequence for stacked chillu-N and RRA in Lohit Malayalam font should be removed

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016989 Bug ID: 1016989 Summary: [ml_IN] non-standard sequence sequence for stacked chillu-N and RRA in Lohit Malayalam font should be removed Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: lohit-malayalam-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: samjnaa(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com This is related to bug #1016984 which I reported just now. As per TUS 6.2 chapter 9.9 p 321 (p 351 of PDF) the correct sequence to get the display of stacked chillu-N on top of RRA in Malayalam is: CHILLU N + VIRAMA + RRA. That is: ൻ്റ = 0d7b 0d4d 0d31. However, currently Lohit Malayalam font does not support this sequence. In bug #1016984 I have requested to add it. Apart from that, note that currently the sequence being used to display stacked chillu-N on top of RRA in Lohit font is ന്റ = 0d28 0d4d 0d31. This is non-standard. It is inadvisable to retain this sequence as having two canonically non-equivalent sequences display the same is a security issue of confusability. My request from the POV of being standard-compliant would be to remove this sequence. However I am sure (based on personal email communication) there will be objection from people such as Santosh Thottingal since they do not agree with the standard on this matter. They maintain that NA + VIRAMA + RRA is the correct sequence to get this display. I have told them that if they disagree with the standard then they should discuss the matter on the Unicode and try to make the Unicode Technical Committee accept their view. Otherwise such sequences will just be standards-non-compliant and the existing diversified situation will only be aggravated. Certainly the current standard-prescribed sequence should be included to be standards compliant. For that I have already filed the separate bug. For 100% compliance the old non-standard should be removed. To track that I am filing this bug now. In the face of community objection, it is up to the project maintainer to decide about this. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.5.4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4mzVmSKdWJ&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 6 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1252564] New: Provide a liberation-fonts virtual package

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252564 Bug ID: 1252564 Summary: Provide a liberation-fonts virtual package Product: Fedora Version: 23 Component: liberation-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: thestig(a)google.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Description of problem: As an ISV, we would like to package a generic Google Chrome RPM that requires liberation fonts. However, "Requires: liberation-fonts" does not work with Fedora because its liberation-fonts are split into multiple packages, and there is no meta-package to install them all. OTOH, OpenSUSE has just 1 package that provides liberation-fonts. http://rpmfind.net//linux/RPM/opensuse/13.2/noarch/liberation-fonts-1.07.... Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): N/A How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Make a RPM that requires "liberation-fonts" 2. Try to install the RPM Actual results: Installation fails Expected results: Installation succeeds and the system has liberation fonts installed. Additional info: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=519322 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=PUHjb3Esdz&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 7 months

1
19
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1239076] New: fcitx-qt5-1.0.3 is available

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239076 Bug ID: 1239076 Summary: fcitx-qt5-1.0.3 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: fcitx-qt5 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com Latest upstream release: 1.0.3 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.0.2-3.fc23 URL: https://github.com/fcitx/fcitx-qt5 Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=VcXT3Q8uU3&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 7 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1040337] New: [or_IN][texlive] - Change language name from "Oriya" to "Odia"

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040337 Bug ID: 1040337 Summary: [or_IN][texlive] - Change language name from "Oriya" to "Odia" Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: texlive Keywords: i18n Severity: low Priority: medium Assignee: novyjindrich(a)gmail.com Reporter: smaitra(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, novyjindrich(a)gmail.com, pertusus(a)free.fr, smaitra(a)redhat.com, than(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Upstream bug reference : https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15601 Preface : As per the Govt of India record, the State name of Orissa has been replaced with Odisha (hopefully I am correct with its spelling) and the language of Odisha State which was Oriya earlier, has been replaced with Odia. Please change the word "Oriya" occurrences to "Odia" in SPEC file. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): texlive-hyphen-indic-svn25990.0-3.fc21 How reproducible: N/A Steps to Reproduce:N/A 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Presently the word "Oriya" is mentioned in the SPEC file. Expected results: Please replace the word "Oriya" with the word "Odia" in the SPEC File for all the occurrences. Additional info: References: http://orissamatters.com/2011/11/07/orissa-became-odisha/ http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/parliament-passes-bill-to-change-orissa... http://orissa.gov.in/e-magazine/Orissareview/2011/Nov/engpdf/9-17.pdf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=HwHbDVF15X&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 7 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1229182] New: Addition of glyphs to Lohit Bengali for recent Unicode additions

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229182 Bug ID: 1229182 Summary: Addition of glyphs to Lohit Bengali for recent Unicode additions Product: Fedora Version: 23 Component: lohit-bengali-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: samjnaa(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1036232 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1036232&action=edit Bengali Anji glyph Unicode 7.0 encoded 0980 Bengali Anji. I have attached the glyph for it. Please include it in Lohit Bengali/Assamese. Since I can specify only one component I have specified Bengali only. Please take the same for Assamese also since after all the scripts are the same. NOTE: I am proposing a few more characters for Bengali/Assamese for Vedic. Once Unicode approves I'll attach those glyphs also here. References: http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0980.pdf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=jOrma7ibeK&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 7 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1229183] New: Addition of glyphs to Lohit Devanagari for recent Unicode additions

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229183 Bug ID: 1229183 Summary: Addition of glyphs to Lohit Devanagari for recent Unicode additions Product: Fedora Version: 23 Component: lohit-devanagari-fonts Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Reporter: samjnaa(a)gmail.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Created attachment 1036233 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1036233&action=edit Glyphs needed to update Lohit Devanagari to Unicode 8.0 Unicode 7.0 encoded 0978 Devanagari Letter Marwari DDA and Unicode 8.0 includes A8FC Devanagari Sign Siddham and A8FD Devanagari Jain OM. I have attached glyphs for these characters. Please add these to Lohit Devanagari and variants. References: http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0900.pdf http://www.unicode.org/Public/8.0.0/charts/blocks/UA8E0.pdf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=JixOJkATzg&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 7 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1256244] New: Transliteration not working on Marathi language

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256244 Bug ID: 1256244 Summary: Transliteration not working on Marathi language Product: Fedora Version: 23 Component: ibus-typing-booster Assignee: mfabian(a)redhat.com Reporter: psatpute(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: anish.developer(a)gmail.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mfabian(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Transliteration not happening for m17n itrans maps languages. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-typing-booster-1.2.11-3.fc23.noarch How reproducible: /usr/share/myspell/mr_IN.dic Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install hunspell-mr 2. Select Marathi Hunspell 3. From Setting select Itrans layout 4. Type any word. say 'praviN' Actual results: Getting in Latin 'praviN' Expected results: प्रविण Additional info: looks like issue with libtranslit. Inscript layout working fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BsDA0eGyUX&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ i18n-bugs mailing list i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

8 years, 7 months

1
22
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1258214] New: [abrt] ibus: bus_dbus_impl_connection_filter_cb(): ibus-daemon killed by SIGABRT

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258214 Bug ID: 1258214 Summary: [abrt] ibus: bus_dbus_impl_connection_filter_cb(): ibus-daemon killed by SIGABRT Product: Fedora Version: 21 Component: ibus Assignee: tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Reporter: frank-buettner(a)gmx.net QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, shawn.p.huang(a)gmail.com, tfujiwar(a)redhat.com Version-Release number of selected component: ibus-1.5.10-5.fc21 Additional info: reporter: libreport-2.3.0 backtrace_rating: 4 cmdline: ibus-daemon --xim --panel disable crash_function: bus_dbus_impl_connection_filter_cb executable: /usr/bin/ibus-daemon kernel: 4.1.5-100.fc21.x86_64 runlevel: N 5 type: CCpp uid: 1000 Truncated backtrace: Thread no. 1 (10 frames) #4 bus_dbus_impl_connection_filter_cb at dbusimpl.c:1473 #5 on_worker_message_about_to_be_sent at gdbusconnection.c:2429 #6 continue_writing at gdbusprivate.c:497 #8 write_message_cb at gdbusprivate.c:1352 #9 g_simple_async_result_complete at gsimpleasyncresult.c:763 #10 write_message_continue_writing at gdbusprivate.c:1066 #11 write_message_async at gdbusprivate.c:1132 #12 continue_writing at gdbusprivate.c:1532 #13 write_message_cb at gdbusprivate.c:1352 #14 g_simple_async_result_complete at gsimpleasyncresult.c:763 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=y8Z2m4wSHY&a=cc_unsubscribe _______________________________________________ i18n-bugs mailing list i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/postorius/i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

8 years, 7 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1236034] New: DejavuSans missing from the list of fonts, forced refresh needed

by Red Hat Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236034 Bug ID: 1236034 Summary: DejavuSans missing from the list of fonts, forced refresh needed Product: Fedora Version: 22 Component: fontconfig Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Reporter: kparal(a)redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Description of problem: I performed a clean install of Fedora 22, moved some data and configuration over from an older system, and found out that I can't select (I don't see) Dejavu Sans fonts in any of my GUI applications. I tried a clean user profile, no change. twaugh helped me resolve this on #fedora-devel by force refreshing a fontconfig cache, and told me to report a bug, because this should not happen. When affected, this is what I saw: $ fc-list | grep -i DejavuSans /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-BoldOblique.ttf: DejaVu Sans Mono:style=Bold Oblique /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf: DejaVu Sans Mono:style=Book /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-Bold.ttf: DejaVu Sans Mono:style=Bold /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-Oblique.ttf: DejaVu Sans Mono:style=Oblique Running fc-cache didn't help: $ sudo fc-cache /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/ $ fc-list | grep -i DejavuSans /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-BoldOblique.ttf: DejaVu Sans Mono:style=Bold Oblique /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf: DejaVu Sans Mono:style=Book /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-Bold.ttf: DejaVu Sans Mono:style=Bold /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-Oblique.ttf: DejaVu Sans Mono:style=Oblique But a forced refresh was successful: $ sudo fc-cache -f /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/ $ fc-list | grep -i DejavuSans /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-BoldOblique.ttf: DejaVu Sans Mono:style=Bold Oblique /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Oblique.ttf: DejaVu Sans,DejaVu Sans Condensed:style=Condensed Oblique,Oblique /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Bold.ttf: DejaVu Sans,DejaVu Sans Condensed:style=Condensed Bold,Bold /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf: DejaVu Sans Mono:style=Book /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-Bold.ttf: DejaVu Sans Mono:style=Bold /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf: DejaVu Sans:style=Book /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-Oblique.ttf: DejaVu Sans Mono:style=Oblique /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf: DejaVu Sans:style=Bold /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed.ttf: DejaVu Sans,DejaVu Sans Condensed:style=Condensed,Book /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf: DejaVu Sans,DejaVu Sans Light:style=ExtraLight /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-BoldOblique.ttf: DejaVu Sans,DejaVu Sans Condensed:style=Condensed Bold Oblique,Bold Oblique /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Oblique.ttf: DejaVu Sans:style=Oblique /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf: DejaVu Sans:style=Bold Oblique I have backed up the original fontconfig cache before updating it, it is attached. The only difference in the file listing seems to be this: $ diff -u orig new --- orig 2015-06-26 13:31:45.049192566 +0200 +++ new 2015-06-26 13:31:50.372176669 +0200 @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ -total 443k +total 463k -rw-r--r--. 1 root root unconfined_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0 3.1k Jun 25 16:10 019629eead7fd8624feacc17e1c76e56-le64.cache-6 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0 192 Jun 24 13:21 0251a5afa6ac727a1e32b7d4d4aa7cf0-le64.cache-6 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root unconfined_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0 1.8k Jun 25 16:23 0cdaf353a0871111e8db86b8a5e64d24-le64.cache-6 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0 2.5k Jun 24 13:23 12513961c6e7090f8648812f9eaf65d6-le64.cache-6 --rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0 24k Jun 24 13:21 12b26b760a24f8b4feb03ad48a333a72-le64.cache-6 +-rw-r--r--. 1 root root unconfined_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0 44k Jun 26 13:30 12b26b760a24f8b4feb03ad48a333a72-le64.cache-6 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0 1.8k Jun 24 13:23 1e1e03b57ed9f0c723c5aeafda46c3fb-le64.cache-6 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0 1.8k Jun 24 13:23 2881ed3fd21ca306ddad6f9b0dd3189f-le64.cache-6 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0 6.7k Jun 24 13:23 2e1514a9fdd499050989183bb65136db-le64.cache-6 @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0 42k Jun 24 13:21 b79f3aaa7d385a141ab53ec885cc22a8-le64.cache-6 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0 1.8k Jun 24 13:23 b887eea8f1b96e1d899b44ed6681fc27-le64.cache-6 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root unconfined_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0 15k Jun 25 13:25 beeeeb3dfe132a8a0633a017c99ce0c0-le64.cache-6 --rw-r--r--. 1 root root unconfined_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0 200 Jun 25 16:23 CACHEDIR.TAG +-rw-r--r--. 1 root root unconfined_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0 200 Jun 26 13:30 CACHEDIR.TAG -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0 5.1k Jun 24 13:23 d3379abda271c4acd2ad0c01f565d0b0-le64.cache-6 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0 1.8k Jun 24 13:23 df893b4576ad6107f9397134092c4059-le64.cache-6 -rw-r--r--. 1 root root system_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0 9.2k Jun 24 13:23 e26bf336397aae6fcef4d3803472adec-le64.cache-6 So one of the cache objects changed from system_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0 to unconfined_u:object_r:fonts_cache_t:s0. But I'm running with selinux permissive, so I guess that shouldn't effect it (however, the system was running in enforcing by default, so maybe it did effect it and it persisted?). Also the timestamp of CACHEDIR.TAG was updated. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fontconfig-2.11.94-1.fc22.x86_64 dejavu-sans-fonts-2.35-1.fc22.noarch How reproducible: always until I force updated the cache. I can still reproduce it if I copy the cache backup back to its original location. Steps to Reproduce: 1. rm /var/cache/fontconfig -r 2. copy the provided backup into /var/cache/fontconfig 3. `fc-list | grep -i DejavuSans` should not show DejavuSans font -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AlIKVliFdZ&a=cc_unsubscribe

8 years, 7 months

1
43
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs August 2015