https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287273
Bug ID: 1287273
Summary: please update to polib 1.0.7
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: python-polib
Assignee: ivazqueznet(a)gmail.com
Reporter: dshea(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: dchen(a)redhat.com, diegobz(a)gmail.com,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
ivazqueznet(a)gmail.com
The latest upstream version of python-polib contains several fixes related to
Python 3 and parsing of plural entries and it would be nice to have in Fedora.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=hDQGcSGESC&a=cc_unsubscribe
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303425
Bug ID: 1303425
Summary: [bn_BD] Country name is Not there, but Country code
only
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: system-config-language
Assignee: pnemade(a)redhat.com
Reporter: aalam(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, nav007(a)gmail.com,
pnemade(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Created attachment 1119917
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1119917&action=edit
Screenshot for issue on Fedora 23
Description of problem:
While using system-config-language, there are two locale for Bengali
---
Bengali (BD)
Bengali (India)
---
While mostly all country names are there for Languages, but this is not case
for 'Bengali'. Bengali has two countries 'BD' and 'India'. This is major issue
as 'BD' is not making any sense for End User, but Developers
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
system-config-language-3.3.0-1.fc23.noarch
system-config-language-1.4.0-6.el7 (centos)
How reproducible:
Everytime
Steps to Reproduce:
1. run system-config-language
2. check name of 'Bengali'
3.
Actual results:
---
Bengali (BD)
Bengali (India)
---
Expected results:
---
Bengali (Bangladesh)
Bengali (India)
---
Additional info:
1. Same issue with CentOS (with provided version)
2. I am not sure if issue with s-c-l, but would like to fix somehow, so started
bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186030
--- Comment #41 from Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer(a)redhat.com> ---
I guess if that xorg.conf snippet works it means that gnome doesn't override
the keyboard model. that would also indicate that gnome doesn't have a setting
for the keyboard model. historically, that makes sense since the model has been
forced to 'evdev' for a number of years anyway.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278676
--- Comment #10 from fujiwara <tfujiwar(a)redhat.com> ---
Thanks for the comments.
I have never used -O0, sorry.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278676
--- Comment #9 from Ľuboš Kardoš <lkardos(a)redhat.com> ---
If adding '-O0' (-O followed by zero) doesn't disable optimization then there
is a bug in gcc.
I mean try 'rpmbuild --define "optflags `rpm -E %{optflags}` -g -O0" .....'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278676
Michael Mráka <mmraka(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mmraka(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #8 from Michael Mráka <mmraka(a)redhat.com> ---
> I think -O is still optimized. I need no -O.
Use -O0 (aka -O<zero>).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278676
--- Comment #7 from fujiwara <tfujiwar(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Ľuboš Kardoš from comment #5)
> (In reply to fujiwara from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Ľuboš Kardoš from comment #3)
> > > You can do this with '--define "optflags `rpm -E %{optflags}` -g"'. If
> >
> > The suggestion does not help my case since the default optflags includes
> > "-O2".
>
> That's not problem, you can override it with another option -O. From gdb man:
>
> If you use multiple -O options, with or without level numbers, the last such
> option is the one that is effective.
I think -O is still optimized. I need no -O.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.