March 2020 - i18n-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1806272] DejaVu has been repackaged in F32+ using new fonts packaging macros; those macros use an srpm-independent file layout and remove srpm-level sharing like the previous -common subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806272 --- Comment #33 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> --- Here is the update with the fixed widelands build: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-324e223a8d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

4 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1806272] DejaVu has been repackaged in F32+ using new fonts packaging macros; those macros use an srpm-independent file layout and remove srpm-level sharing like the previous -common subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806272 --- Comment #32 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #28) > Suplemenets are not guaranteed to be there and are not pulled in with > BuildRequires. > > Can we just please make the symbolic links part of the main packages? Than > we can coordinate their removal with all dependent packages. Actually not having these automatically added to buildroots is a feature IMHO. I'm switching all my packages which use direct file-path accesses to fonts (e.g. games using SDL_ttf) to use fc-match to generate the filename during the build and then replace the bundled fonts with a symlink generated this way. If we get the compat symlinks added then fc-match will prefer the compat-path and print that, causing potential troubles / need for a rebuild if we remove the compat symlinks later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

4 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1806272] DejaVu has been repackaged in F32+ using new fonts packaging macros; those macros use an srpm-independent file layout and remove srpm-level sharing like the previous -common subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806272 --- Comment #31 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #30) > The problem here seems to be replacing the Dejavu symlink to the dejavu > directory with a Dejavu directory with symlinks to the individual font > files. So we are hitting: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > Directory_Replacement/ > here and according to that page, this is a widelands problem and the fix is > to remove the symlink in a %pretrans script. I'm working on a fixed package > for this now. Ok, so the tricks from: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Directory_Repla... Do not work. Instead I've kept the symlinks and made them point to a new dir under /usr/share/widelands/i18n/fonts, e.g. I made the "DejaVu" symlink point be a relative link to "dejavu-fonts" which is a new dir under /usr/share/widelands/i18n/fonts and this new dir then contains links to all the DejaVuSerif DejaVuSans and DejaVuSansMono ttf files. I've started a new widelands build with these changes includes, once this hits the stable updates repo, the upgrade problem should be fixed (upgrading works for me using a mockbuild I did to test). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

4 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1814349] Rename Request: google-caladea-fonts - Caladea, a serif font family metric-compatible with Cambria font family

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

4 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1814351] Rename Request: google-carlito-fonts - Carlito, a sans-serif font family metric-compatible with Calibri font family

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814351 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla <gwync(a)protonmail.com> --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/google-carlito-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

4 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1814351] Rename Request: google-carlito-fonts - Carlito, a sans-serif font family metric-compatible with Calibri font family

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814351 Parag Nemade <pnemade(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net --- Comment #4 from Parag Nemade <pnemade(a)redhat.com> --- Thanks for this package review. I will keep checking for github source availability. Updated the Summary and description for this package as well for "font" to "font family". https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/pnemade/fedora-review/... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

4 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1814351] Rename Request: google-carlito-fonts - Carlito, a sans-serif font family metric-compatible with Calibri font family

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

4 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1814349] Rename Request: google-caladea-fonts - Serif font metric-compatible with Cambria font

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1814349 --- Comment #2 from Parag Nemade <pnemade(a)redhat.com> --- Can you please help me to understand, what is wrong with this new SPEC file? It is not constructing proper Source URL. https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/ht-caladea-fonts.spec It appears many packages I reviewed that uses %forgeurl, also added commit id but strange I missed to notice that they are not present for few other packages like ht-alegreya-sans-fonts, uswds-public-sans-fonts, jetbrains-mono-fonts, ibm-plex-fonts. Also, upstream uses 1.001 version whereas existing package used 1.002 so I think Epoch need to be added now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

4 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1806272] DejaVu has been repackaged in F32+ using new fonts packaging macros; those macros use an srpm-independent file layout and remove srpm-level sharing like the previous -common subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806272 --- Comment #30 from Hans de Goede <hdegoede(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to Solomon Peachy from comment #29) > While doing an upgrade from F31 to F32 beta, I ran into a problem: > > [...] > Running transaction test > The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful > transaction. > You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. > Error: Transaction test error: > file /usr/share/widelands/i18n/fonts/DejaVu from install of > widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > widelands-0-0.72.build20.fc31.x86_64 > file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf conflicts between > attempted installs of compat-f32-dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-7.fc32.noarch and > widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 > file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf conflicts between > attempted installs of compat-f32-dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-7.fc32.noarch and > widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 > file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf conflicts between > attempted installs of compat-f32-dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-7.fc32.noarch and > widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 > [...and many many more font conflicts] > > On fedora-devel I was told this is a packaging bug with dejavu-fonts (not > widelands) and to speak up in this ticket.. The problem here seems to be replacing the Dejavu symlink to the dejavu directory with a Dejavu directory with symlinks to the individual font files. So we are hitting: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Directory_Repla... here and according to that page, this is a widelands problem and the fix is to remove the symlink in a %pretrans script. I'm working on a fixed package for this now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

4 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Fedora-i18n-bugs] [Bug 1806272] DejaVu has been repackaged in F32+ using new fonts packaging macros; those macros use an srpm-independent file layout and remove srpm-level sharing like the previous -common subpackage

by bugzilla＠redhat.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1806272 Solomon Peachy <pizza(a)shaftnet.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pizza(a)shaftnet.org --- Comment #29 from Solomon Peachy <pizza(a)shaftnet.org> --- While doing an upgrade from F31 to F32 beta, I ran into a problem: [...] Running transaction test The downloaded packages were saved in cache until the next successful transaction. You can remove cached packages by executing 'dnf clean packages'. Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/share/widelands/i18n/fonts/DejaVu from install of widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 conflicts with file from package widelands-0-0.72.build20.fc31.x86_64 file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf conflicts between attempted installs of compat-f32-dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-7.fc32.noarch and widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf conflicts between attempted installs of compat-f32-dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-7.fc32.noarch and widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf conflicts between attempted installs of compat-f32-dejavu-sans-fonts-2.37-7.fc32.noarch and widelands-0-0.76.build20.fc32.x86_64 [...and many many more font conflicts] On fedora-devel I was told this is a packaging bug with dejavu-fonts (not widelands) and to speak up in this ticket.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

4 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

i18n-bugs March 2020