https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251384
Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |erack(a)redhat.com,
| |gecko-bugs-nobody@fedorapro
| |ject.org,
| |jhorak(a)redhat.com,
| |klaas(a)demter.de
Assignee|tagoh(a)redhat.com |gecko-bugs-nobody@fedorapro
| |ject.org
Component|fontconfig |firefox
Flags|needinfo?(tagoh(a)redhat.com) |
|needinfo?(tagoh(a)redhat.com) |
--- Comment #3 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh(a)redhat.com> ---
None of these problems are reproducible in other distros that use
noto sans arabic as default.
For example ubuntu which uses noto sans, correctly display noto sans in the everywhere in
all of the previously mentioned 4 problematic scenarios .
With Droid Arabic Kufi font installed? or without?
Seeing that kufi font is somehow found to be used in wierd specific
cases across several totally unrelated packages in fedora(epihany/chrome/firefox), and
these findings are completely absent in ubuntu, I wonder what is the current fedora config
of the kufi font? What are these applications doing that they somehow get kufi font to
render some text only in fedora but not other distros?! I don't know anything about
how fonts work in linux so i'm helpless here.
We have google-droid-sans-fonts installed due to satisfy dependency for
ghostscript. We know it has some problems on text rendering but we can't drop
it because of it.
Anyway:
1. Using latest fedora image, I can reproduce the kufi font problem
only by using private windows in firefox. normal windows are using the correct noto sans
but private windows somehow use kufi in firefox.
This looks more likely a firefox specific problem. let me reassign this to
firefox so far.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251384
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...