https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308631
Bug ID: 1308631 Summary: Install of python-polib fails if system has renamed python2-polib Product: Fedora Version: 23 Component: python-polib Assignee: dchen@redhat.com Reporter: mkubik@redhat.com QA Contact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: dchen@redhat.com, diegobz@gmail.com, dshea@redhat.com, i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org, ivazqueznet@gmail.com, moez.roy@gmail.com
Description of problem: When trying to install a package depending on python-polib on a system that has newer version installed (python2-polib 1.0.7-2) DNF does not recognize the package and creates conflict.
Actual results: Error: installed package python2-polib-1.0.7-2.fc23.noarch obsoletes python-polib < 1.0.7-2.fc23 provided by python-polib-1.0.3-6.fc23.noarch (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages)
Expected results: dnf doesn't try to erase the newer package
Additional info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308631
David Shea dshea@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jsilhan@redhat.com, | |mluscon@redhat.com, | |packaging-team-maint@redhat | |.com, pnemade@redhat.com, | |vmukhame@redhat.com Component|python-polib |dnf Assignee|dchen@redhat.com |packaging-team-maint@redhat | |.com
--- Comment #1 from David Shea dshea@redhat.com --- $ rpm -q --provides python2-polib python-polib = 1.0.7-3.fc24 python2-polib = 1.0.7-3.fc24
So this is either a problem in dnf or something wrong with the %python_provide macro.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308631
--- Comment #2 from Milan KubĂk mkubik@redhat.com --- It seems I ran into this again. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1096506
Thanks for looking into it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308631
Jan Silhan jsilhan@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed| |2016-02-22 07:27:19
--- Comment #3 from Jan Silhan jsilhan@redhat.com ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1096506 ***
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org