Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468823
Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag| |needinfo?(tagoh(a)redhat.com)
--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-11-10
03:20:43 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #3)
I've already asked on fedora-legal-list, and just followed him to
describe
License tag -
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2008-October/msg00022.html
If you could convince spot to publish this on his "licenses approved for fonts
use" wiki page, that would make it easier for the next reviewers. Anyway
> 2. please follow the font packaging process outlined on
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle
> and in particular create a wiki page that describes your font and can be
> referenced in release notes
Just created:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hanazono_font
Nice. You just need to remove the : before Category to activate them (fixed, I
must rework the template help, everyone makes the same mistake)
> 3. your fontconfig priority (59) is a little low, our guidelines
states CJK
> fonts should be in the 65-69 range
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Simple_priority_l...
>
> 4. your fontconfig rule is a bit more convoluted than what we usually do. It
> probably works but please get Behdad to review it (and ok it there).
I'd like to push this font prior to sazanami-mincho.ttf which we defaults for
Serif for Japanese, because the quality is better than it. I'm not sure what's
the right thing to do that for fontconfig config. that would be appreciated if
someone could helps me.
Ultimately, Behdad is the best judge of us all on fontconfig stuff.
> 5. please also alias the font the other way, so fontconfig knows
it should use
> serif fonts to complete HanaMin
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fontconfig_packaging_tips#Generic_names
Fixed in the updated package.
Nope, the rule I referenced would have been
<alias>
<family>HanaMin</family>
<default>
<family>serif</family>
</default>
</alias>
The rule you added is equivalent to the one you already had, without the ja
test.
The fun thing is that your original rule needs to be placed after
conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf to work, and your second rule needs to be placed
before, so you can't use both in the same file :p
Thus I'd advise to
1. keep your original rule
2. add the one I just wrote
3. use 66 as fontconfig prio
4. test test test
> 7. you can drop the -f argument to fc-cache for releases ≥
Fedora 9
Can you update the template page as well to see what's the expected thing
hereafter?
It's documented in the comments nobody seems to read :) I'll drop it as soon as
Fedora 8 in un-supported.
Appart from the fontconfig bit, you're almost there
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.