Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: [abrt] crash in ibus-1.3.2-2.fc12: Process /usr/bin/ibus-daemon was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587353
Summary: [abrt] crash in ibus-1.3.2-2.fc12: Process /usr/bin/ibus-daemon was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT) Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: i686 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: abrt_hash:778b1befb049b00852b9bea7c45232ddbe4b4ea5 Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus AssignedTo: phuang@redhat.com ReportedBy: renlei040766@sina.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: phuang@redhat.com, i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora
abrt 1.0.9 detected a crash.
architecture: i686 Attached file: backtrace cmdline: /usr/bin/ibus-daemon --xim component: ibus executable: /usr/bin/ibus-daemon global_uuid: 778b1befb049b00852b9bea7c45232ddbe4b4ea5 kernel: 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE package: ibus-1.3.2-2.fc12 rating: 4 reason: Process /usr/bin/ibus-daemon was killed by signal 6 (SIGABRT) release: Fedora release 12 (Constantine)
How to reproduce ----- 1.open google-chrome 2.visit web.sanguosha.com 3.input words in chat window ,so crumble
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587353
--- Comment #1 from renlei renlei040766@sina.com 2010-04-29 12:54:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=410165) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=410165) File: backtrace
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587353
Peng Huang phuang@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(renlei040766@sina | |.com)
--- Comment #2 from Peng Huang phuang@redhat.com 2010-04-29 22:52:20 EDT --- Does it always happen?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587353
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-02 00:07:57 EDT --- ibus-1.3.2-3.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ibus-1.3.2-3.fc12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587353
Peng Huang phuang@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587353
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-05-04 02:16:26 EDT --- ibus-1.3.2-3.fc12 has been pushed to the Fedora 12 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=587353
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(renlei040766@sina | |.com) | Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |ibus-1.3.2-3.fc12 Resolution| |ERRATA
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org