Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505100
--- Comment #76 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-10-31 06:17:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #74)
I don't want to bring xim back into the main gtk package. Imo, this is a step back.
What is the problem with replacing gtk-im-context-simple with im-xim.so as the default IM context?
I see it as a step forward not a step back. :)
We need to have a single input method framework that actually works for everybody, not a patchwork where you have to pick whatever works best for your language.
Well I would like that ibus can also handle X compose better: hopefully for f13 but rather unlikely for f12 release... we need a fix now this has been broken since f11. :-(
It is not a patchwork but consistent with qt's behaviour.
(In reply to comment #75)
It's also not really true that Qt uses XIM by default.
Erm, we are talking about qt immodules here - sorry for being unclear perhaps: try running "QT_IM_MODULE= qtconfig-qt4" -> Interface and looking at "Default Input Method".
Anyway Qt already works the discussion here is about X and gtk apps.
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org