--- Comment #17 from Ding-Yi Chen <dchen(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> It's not the words, it's the tone and the fact that you
keep on reopening a bug that I said we would not patch downstream.
There are at least two Red Hat guy here.
One guy is a spammer that never respond to the real problem here. Quotes:
"PS: Unlucky, it's the same people upstream and downstream."
"You're missing Ma being a jerk downstream about that same subject. The bug
that's being hinted at above is that we do whitelisting of input sources. We
won't change that, however annoying the reporter gets."
"Personal attacks? How nice."
This guy want to close this bug.
Another guy sees the real problem and want to open this bug.
I support the later guy however annoying the spammer gets.
BTW, I'm not aware of tone stuff in English.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tone_%28linguistics%29
I pointed out the UX issue, the docs issue.
I won't quit until the issues are resolved.
The guy created the issues and tried hard to undermine resolving effort
deserves blaming.
Ma,
I maybe wrong, but using sarcasm is not the best way to reach consensus.
This is a technique issue and should be addressed and discussed as one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug