https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226831
Bug ID: 1226831
Summary: /etc/fonts/fonts.conf claims it references local.conf
but it does not
Product: Fedora
Version: 22
Component: fontconfig
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Reporter: jpazdziora(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, pnemade(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Attempting to fix broken fonts in my terminal after upgrade to Fedora 22, I
read various documentation about how fonts are supposed to be configured these
days. One of the sources of wisdom are:
# head -22 /etc/fonts/fonts.conf
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<!-- /etc/fonts/fonts.conf file to configure system font access -->
<fontconfig>
<!--
DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE.
IT WILL BE REPLACED WHEN FONTCONFIG IS UPDATED.
LOCAL CHANGES BELONG IN 'local.conf'.
The intent of this standard configuration file is to be adequate for
most environments. If you have a reasonably normal environment and
have found problems with this configuration, they are probably
things that others will also want fixed. Please submit any
problems to the fontconfig bugzilla system located at
fontconfig.org
Note that the normal 'make install' procedure for fontconfig is to
replace any existing fonts.conf file with the new version. Place
any local customizations in local.conf which this file references.
Keith Packard
-->
However, there are no references to local.conf in fonts.conf beyond this
initial documentation:
# grep local.conf /etc/fonts/fonts.conf
LOCAL CHANGES BELONG IN 'local.conf'.
any local customizations in local.conf which this file references.
#
Please fix this documentation/warning snippet to show valid configuration
locations.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# rpm -qf /etc/fonts/fonts.conf
fontconfig-2.11.93-2.fc22.x86_64
How reproducible:
Deterministic.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Attempt to configure fonts.
2. Read the documentation at the top of /etc/fonts/fonts.conf.
3. Place customization to /etc/fonts/local.conf.
4. Wonder why the changes are not reflected in any way.
5. Check if fonts.conf references local.conf like it promises to do.
Actual results:
It does not -- documentation and reality mismatch.
Expected results:
It does, or better yet -- the documentation at the top of the file points the
user to /etc/fonts/conf.d or similar location that is actually referenced by
<include ...> in /etc/fonts/fonts.conf.
Additional info:
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=3hEi6YZCrj&a=cc_unsubscribe