Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese characters get rendered with a different font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562
Summary: vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 makes some Japanese characters get rendered with a different font Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: VLGothic-fonts AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki@users.sourceforge.net ReportedBy: kee@ketan.jp QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: tagoh@redhat.com, ryo-dairiki@users.sourceforge.net, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Created an attachment (id=331920) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331920) Rendering comparison
Description of problem: After installing vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch, some Japanese characters are incorrectly rendered with a different font (apparently a Chinese one). More specifically, when an ASCII alphabetical character is followed some Japanese characters (Japanese punctuations for example), the followed characters are not rendered with the VLGothic font, but with a Chinese one.
This does not happen with VLGothic-fonts-20081029-1.fc10.noarch and before. See attached image for comparison. gedit is used for capturing. The "monospace" font and the "sans-serif" font causes this problem.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch
How reproducible: Always.
Steps to Reproduce: 1. Display a Japanese text with "monospace" or "sans-serif" font.
Actual results: Some characters are rendered with a Chinese font.
Expected results: Characters should be rendered with the VLGothic font.
Additional info:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562
Ryo Dairiki ryo-dairiki@users.sourceforge.net changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Clone Of| |#485562
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562
Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Clone Of|#485562 |475743
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562
Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cchance@redhat.com, | |petersen@redhat.com Component|VLGothic-fonts |cjkunifonts AssignedTo|ryo-dairiki@users.sourcefor |cchance@redhat.com |ge.net | Summary|vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.f |Chinese fonts is used for |c10 makes some Japanese |Japanese desktop after |characters get rendered |vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.f |with a different font |c10 installed
--- Comment #1 from Akira TAGOH tagoh@redhat.com 2009-02-15 21:04:01 EDT --- Better reassigning to cjkunifonts.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562
--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-02-15 22:02:49 EDT --- Can you post the output of:
rpm -qa *fonts* | sort
It would be hopeful if you can narrow down which font package is causing the problem. It might be baekmuk-ttf for example? (see also end of bug 475743 comment 32)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562
Caius "kaio" Chance cchance@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562
Caius "kaio" Chance cchance@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n
--- Comment #4 from Caius "kaio" Chance cchance@redhat.com 2009-02-16 10:55:53 EDT --- This one might be duplicated to bug #475743.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562
--- Comment #5 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazqueznet@gmail.com 2009-02-24 01:48:10 EDT --- The issue is 64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf. After renaming it to 67-... various glyphs came up as gothic. This file probably needs to be split into a high-priority serif portion, and a low-priority sans portion.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-02-24 02:09:38 EDT --- Perhaps you can test with the cjkuni-*fonts packages in rawhide and see if that works better for you?
They already have some fontconfig changes included.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |medium
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562
--- Comment #7 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazqueznet@gmail.com 2009-02-24 02:47:11 EDT --- Installing the fonts from Rawhide did help.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562
--- Comment #8 from Caius "kaio" Chance cchance@redhat.com 2009-02-24 23:26:17 EDT --- i have backported to F10:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/cjkunifonts/0.2.20080216.1/11.fc1...
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=86225
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-02-24 23:29:38 EDT --- cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-11.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-11.fc10
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562
Caius "kaio" Chance cchance@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kee@ketan.jp)
--- Comment #10 from Caius "kaio" Chance cchance@redhat.com 2009-02-25 00:13:43 EDT --- Hi Yuta, could you kindly provide the test case you mentioned in comment #1 please? Thanks.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562
Yuta Kitamura kee@ketan.jp changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kee@ketan.jp) |
--- Comment #11 from Yuta Kitamura kee@ketan.jp 2009-02-27 03:12:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=333444) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333444) Test case after cjkunifonts-uming package updated
OK, here's a screenshot. It seems that everything is working flawlessly.
Just FYI, I've updated only cjkunifonts-uming package, because it's the only package of cjkunifonts-* series installed in my box.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562
Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen petersen@redhat.com 2009-03-01 20:47:45 EDT --- Thanks for testing.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-13 14:42:10 EDT --- cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-11.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485562
Caius 'kaio' Chance cchance@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org