Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Should ibus-table obsolete ibus-table-additional
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554471
Summary: Should ibus-table obsolete ibus-table-additional Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ibus-table AssignedTo: cchance@redhat.com ReportedBy: bruno@wolff.to QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: cchance@redhat.com, phuang@redhat.com, fedora-i18n-bugs@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Description of problem: The ibus-table-additional package has been dropped from rawhide, but because it depends on ibus-table, upgrades of ibus-table were blocked pending manually removing ibus-table-additional. Even if the new ibus-table doesn't actually provide the feature that was formerly supplied by ibus-table-additional it still might make sense to have ibus-table obsolete ibus-table-additional so that yum upgrades work smoothly.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): ibus-table-1.2.0.20100111-1.fc13.noarch ibus-table-additional-1.2.0.20090912-3.fc13.noarch ibus-table-1.2.0.20090912-3.fc13.noarch
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554471
Bruno Wolff III bruno@wolff.to changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Should ibus-table obsolete |Should ibus-table obsolete |ibus-table-additional |ibus-table-additional?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554471
Caius 'kaio' Chance cchance@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |i18n
--- Comment #1 from Caius 'kaio' Chance cchance@redhat.com 2010-01-13 20:37:05 EST --- yes it should
also, ibus-table-latin and ibus-table-code should be obsoleting ibus-table-additional instead (they are still in package review progress)
we should temp obsoletes by ibus-table and tables in -additional are provided by ibus-table until ibus-table-{latin,code} are ready in rawhide repo
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554471
Caius 'kaio' Chance cchance@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
--- Comment #2 from Caius 'kaio' Chance cchance@redhat.com 2010-01-13 20:46:32 EST --- fixed in http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1920208
i18n-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org