mono-uia in Fedora 12

[Stephen Shaw]

I was wondering if it would be possible to get the mono-uia stuff into
Fedora 12?  There was work to get it into 11, but gtk-sharp was one
rev to old (2.12.7 If I remember right)

Thanks,
Stephen

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 16:48 -0600, Stephen Shaw wrote:
>  I was wondering if it would be possible to get the mono-uia stuff
> into
>  Fedora 12?  There was work to get it into 11, but gtk-sharp was one
>  rev to old (2.12.7 If I remember right)
>   
Any review requests?

Regards,

-- 
Michel

[Stephen Shaw]

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Michel Salim<michael.silvanus(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>  On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 16:48 -0600, Stephen Shaw wrote:
> > I was wondering if it would be possible to get the mono-uia stuff into
> > Fedora 12?  There was work to get it into 11, but gtk-sharp was one
> > rev to old (2.12.7 If I remember right)
> >
>  Any review requests?
>
>  Regards,
>
>  --
>  Michel 
I've never submitted a package to fedora before.  I did post the spec
files for review on the ML and then came to the conclusion that
gtk-sharp 2.12.8 was needed first.  That's where we left off.

Willing to learn ;)
Stephen

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 10:30 -0600, Stephen Shaw wrote:

>  I've never submitted a package to fedora before.  I did post the
> spec
>  files for review on the ML and then came to the conclusion that
>  gtk-sharp 2.12.8 was needed first.  That's where we left off.
>   
Ah. Well, I can update gtk-sharp2 in Rawhide to the latest version. Are
you interested in maintaining mono-uia? In which case I'd encourage you
to apply to be a package maintainer -- I can sponsor your application.

Regards,

-- 
Michel Salim
 <SalimMA(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
  GPG key ID: 78884778
  IRC:        hircus

Package Sponsor,
  Fedora Project

[Stephen Shaw]

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Michel Salim<michael.silvanus(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>  On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 10:30 -0600, Stephen Shaw wrote:
>
> > I've never submitted a package to fedora before.  I did post the spec
> > files for review on the ML and then came to the conclusion that
> > gtk-sharp 2.12.8 was needed first.  That's where we left off.
> >
>  Ah. Well, I can update gtk-sharp2 in Rawhide to the latest version. Are
>  you interested in maintaining mono-uia? In which case I'd encourage you
>  to apply to be a package maintainer -- I can sponsor your application.
>
>  Regards,
>
>  --
>  Michel Salim
>   <SalimMA(a)fedoraproject.org>
>   GPG key ID: 78884778
>   IRC:        hircus
>
>  Package Sponsor,
>   Fedora Project
>  
I'd like to avoid being the official maintainer, but have no problems
helping out and providing the spec files.  If I need to be a package
maintainer I can do that.

Thanks,
Stephen

[David Nielsen]

2009/8/26 Stephen Shaw <sshaw(a)decriptor.com&gt;

>  On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Michel
> Salim&lt;michael.silvanus(a)gmail.com&gt;
>  wrote:
>  > On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 10:30 -0600, Stephen Shaw wrote:
>  >
>  >> I've never submitted a package to fedora before.  I did post the spec
>  >> files for review on the ML and then came to the conclusion that
>  >> gtk-sharp 2.12.8 was needed first.  That's where we left off.
>  >>
>  > Ah. Well, I can update gtk-sharp2 in Rawhide to the latest version. Are
>  > you interested in maintaining mono-uia? In which case I'd encourage you
>  > to apply to be a package maintainer -- I can sponsor your application.
>  >
>  > Regards,
>  >
>  > --
>  > Michel Salim
>  >  <SalimMA(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
>  >  GPG key ID: 78884778
>  >  IRC:        hircus
>  >
>  > Package Sponsor,
>  >  Fedora Project
>  >
>
>  I'd like to avoid being the official maintainer, but have no problems
>  helping out and providing the spec files.  If I need to be a package
>  maintainer I can do that. 

Would it be possible I wonder to have a MonoSIG user we could register as
the maintainer for all the mono packages (unless specific packages are
requested not to by it maintainer). That way we could all pitch in as a SIG
and Stephen (and others in the situation where maintainership would imped on
upstream duties or work duties) would be able to focus on handling the,
many, bugs our users find. This seems to be a win for upstream and a win for
us.

- David

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 21:25 +0200, David Nielsen wrote:

>  Would it be possible I wonder to have a MonoSIG user we could
> register
>  as the maintainer for all the mono packages (unless specific packages
>  are requested not to by it maintainer). That way we could all pitch in
>  as a SIG and Stephen (and others in the situation where maintainership
>  would imped on upstream duties or work duties) would be able to focus
>  on handling the, many, bugs our users find. This seems to be a win for
>  upstream and a win for us.
>   
That would be a way, but having been at the receiving end of a slew of
Banshee bugs (some of them invalids, some of them impossible to verify
without the right hardware), I'm shying away from this.

If no one volunteers, we can still do this on a case-by-case basis.
Anyone wants to be primary maintainer for mono-uia?

Regards,


-- 
Michel Salim
 <SalimMA(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
  GPG key ID: 78884778
  IRC:        hircus

Package Sponsor,
  Fedora Project

[Christian Krause]

Hi,

Michel Salim wrote:

>  If no one volunteers, we can still do this on a case-by-case basis.
>  Anyone wants to be primary maintainer for mono-uia? 
I would volunteer to maintain it. Are the newest spec files still
available here:
http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/viewvc/trunk/uia2atk/build/specs/
or is there a better source?

Best regards,
Christian

[Stephen Shaw]

Sorry. On the blackberry.  There should be a directory for fedora.
There are some diffs, but I try to keep then the same as much as
possible

Cheers,
Stephen

On 8/26/09, Christian Krause <chkr(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
>  Hi,
>
>  Michel Salim wrote:
>
> > If no one volunteers, we can still do this on a case-by-case basis.
> > Anyone wants to be primary maintainer for mono-uia?
>
>  I would volunteer to maintain it. Are the newest spec files still
>  available here:
>  http://anonsvn.mono-project.com/viewvc/trunk/uia2atk/build/specs/
>  or is there a better source?
>
>  Best regards,
>  Christian
>  _______________________________________________
>  fedora-mono mailing list
>  fedora-mono(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fedora-mono
>

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 19:26 -0600, Stephen Shaw wrote:
>  Sorry. On the blackberry.  There should be a directory for fedora.
>  There are some diffs, but I try to keep then the same as much as
>  possible
>   
So, since we'd like Stephen to join the packaging effort anyway, let's
have him submit a review, I sponsor him, then Christian can request to
be a comaintainer, and then they can swap roles.

Phew, musical chairs!

Cheers,

-- 
Michel Salim
 <SalimMA(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
  GPG key ID: 78884778
  IRC:        hircus

Package Sponsor,
  Fedora Project