Hello everyone,
Please join us at the next Open NeuroFedora team meeting on Monday 10th October(today!) at 1300UTC in #fedora-neuro on Matrix or IRC (Libera.chat). The meeting is a public meeting, and open for everyone to attend. You can join us over:
Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#neuro:fedoraproject.org IRC: https://webchat.libera.chat/?channels=#fedora-neuro
You can use this link to see the local time for the meeting: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Open+NeuroFedora+M...
or you can use this command in a terminal: $ date --date='TZ="UTC" 1300 today'
The meeting will be chaired by @ankursinha. The agenda for the meeting is:
- New introductions and roll call. - Tasks from last meeting: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2022-10-10/neurofedora.2022-1... - Open Pagure tickets: https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/issues?status=Open&tags=S%3A+Nex... - Package health check: https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/neuro-sig - Open package reviews check: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=fedora-neuro - CompNeuro lab compose status check for F37/F38: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=30691 - Neuroscience query of the week - Next meeting day, and chair. - Open floor.
We hope to see you there!
The meeting announcement is also posted on the NeuroFedora blog here: https://neuroblog.fedoraproject.org/2022/10/09/next-open-neurofedora-meeting...
You can learn more about NeuroFedora here: https://neuro.fedoraproject.org
Hi folks,
Here are the logs from today's meeting. The next meeting will again be in 2 weeks at 1300 UTC on 24th October. See you all then :)
======================================= #fedora-neuro: NeuroFedora - 2022-10-10 =======================================
Meeting started by FranciscoD_ at 13:00:27 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2022-10-10/neurofedora.2022-1... .
Meeting summary --------------- * Please refer to this wiki page for bot commands: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Meeting:Guide#MeetBot_Commands (FranciscoD_, 13:00:49) * Agenda is published on the blog here: https://neuroblog.fedoraproject.org/2022/10/09/next-open-neurofedora-meeting... (FranciscoD_, 13:00:56) * Introductions and roll call (FranciscoD_, 13:01:09)
* Tasks from last meeting (FranciscoD_, 13:05:57) * Minutes from last meeting are here: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-neuro/2022-09-26/neurofedora.2022-0... (FranciscoD_, 13:06:35) * ACTION: FranciscoD_ correct link in blog post (FranciscoD_, 13:06:46) * FranciscoD_ look at python-pyABF build issues -> DONE (FranciscoD_, 13:08:29) * FranciscoD_ update python-mne: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115503 -> WIP: the current release doesn't work with the new matplotlib, the next one will, so I'll wait for that and then update. I've made a note in the bug (FranciscoD_, 13:10:29) * FranciscoD_ fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126115 -> WIP: It built fine in mock and then failed in koji on i686, so gotta check what's up (FranciscoD_, 13:12:05) * ACTION: FranciscoD_ fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126115 (FranciscoD_, 13:13:00) * ACTION: FranciscoD_ fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115503 (FranciscoD_, 13:13:23) * FranciscoD_ make pynn excludearch s390x -> DONE (FranciscoD_, 13:13:36) * FranciscoD_ also add excludearch for elephant and efel and epyviewer -> DONE (FranciscoD_, 13:13:48) * LINK: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/neurofedora@lists.fedoraprojec... (FranciscoD_, 13:17:36) * ACTION: Penguinpee add link to ML explanation e-mail to bug (FranciscoD_, 13:19:01) * LINK: https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib#versions--releases suggests to me that both 6.0.0 and 5.0.0 are in development (FranciscoD_, 13:24:16) * LINK: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Conflicts/#_accept... (music[m], 13:28:49) * LINK: https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/releases/tag/6.0.0 doesn’t indicate much other than dropped support for old pythons (music[m], 13:32:03) * LINK: https://paste.centos.org/view/d0776b26 (FranciscoD_, 13:32:14) * LINK: https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md (Penguinpee, 13:34:01) * ACTION: Penguinpee ask odml upstream what their plans for rdflib 6.0.0 are (preferably with a time line) (FranciscoD_, 13:51:39)
* Open pagure tickets (FranciscoD_, 13:52:59) * No open pagure tickets (FranciscoD_, 13:53:03)
* Comp-neuro Fedora ISO status check (FranciscoD_, 13:53:12) * https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=30691 -> All green, looks good (FranciscoD_, 13:53:21)
* Open reviews check (FranciscoD_, 13:53:38) * 6 open reviews at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=fedora-neuro -> folks, please take these on and review (FranciscoD_, 13:53:49) * Please feel free to ask for review swaps on the -devel list too. Great way of working with more package maintainers :) (FranciscoD_, 13:54:44) * ACTION: neuro-sig review open review tickets: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=fedora-neuro (FranciscoD_, 13:54:58)
* Package health check (FranciscoD_, 13:55:27) * Packages look in good health---a few FTBFS/FTI bugs: folks please work on these and prioritise them, especially if they affect current releases (f36, f37) (FranciscoD_, 13:56:43) * Quite a few packages are impacted by python-cached_property being orphaned, but it's already been take up by admawill so we're good (FranciscoD_, 13:58:11)
* Open floor (FranciscoD_, 13:58:40) * davdunc is referring to this mindshare ticket: https://pagure.io/mindshare/issue/93 (FranciscoD_, 13:58:56)
Meeting ended at 14:01:27 UTC.
Action Items ------------ * FranciscoD_ correct link in blog post * FranciscoD_ fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126115 * FranciscoD_ fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115503 * Penguinpee add link to ML explanation e-mail to bug * Penguinpee ask odml upstream what their plans for rdflib 6.0.0 are (preferably with a time line) * neuro-sig review open review tickets: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=fedora-neuro
Action Items, by person ----------------------- * FranciscoD_ * FranciscoD_ correct link in blog post * FranciscoD_ fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126115 * FranciscoD_ fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115503 * Penguinpee * Penguinpee add link to ML explanation e-mail to bug * Penguinpee ask odml upstream what their plans for rdflib 6.0.0 are (preferably with a time line) * **UNASSIGNED** * neuro-sig review open review tickets: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=fedora-neuro
People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * FranciscoD_ (114) * Penguinpee (44) * music[m] (14) * zodbot (12) * davdunc[m (5) * music (0) * davdunc (0)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.4
.. _`MeetBot`: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zodbot#Meeting_Functions
On 10-10-2022 10:57, Ankur Sinha wrote:
- Open floor.
## Co-maintaining python-pandas
This was on my list for today's meeting. It dropped off my radar.
The package was recently orphaned and picked up by Jonathan Wright (jonathanspw)[1]. I assume (haven't checked) that quite some packages in the NeuroFedora pool depend on it. If that's true, I think it would make sense to take up co-maintenance of the package as neuro-sig.
Please let me know what you think, and I'll get back to Jonathan.
[1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/...
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 16:50:04 +0200, Sandro wrote:
On 10-10-2022 10:57, Ankur Sinha wrote:
- Open floor.
## Co-maintaining python-pandas
This was on my list for today's meeting. It dropped off my radar.
The package was recently orphaned and picked up by Jonathan Wright (jonathanspw)[1]. I assume (haven't checked) that quite some packages in the NeuroFedora pool depend on it. If that's true, I think it would make sense to take up co-maintenance of the package as neuro-sig.
Please let me know what you think, and I'll get back to Jonathan.
[1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/...
Thanks for bringing this up, Sandro :)
Pandas is quite a general package that's commonly used by lots of other Python packages. It isn't exactly neuroscience specific, it's more like numpy.
So, I think we can perhaps help co-maintain it, but we probably don't want to be the main maintainers/admins, since it is a dep for us and we'd rather folks that actively use it directly maintain it?
List of packages depending on python3-pandas is attached.
On 10-10-2022 17:16, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 16:50:04 +0200, Sandro wrote:
On 10-10-2022 10:57, Ankur Sinha wrote:
- Open floor.
## Co-maintaining python-pandas
This was on my list for today's meeting. It dropped off my radar.
The package was recently orphaned and picked up by Jonathan Wright (jonathanspw)[1]. I assume (haven't checked) that quite some packages in the NeuroFedora pool depend on it. If that's true, I think it would make sense to take up co-maintenance of the package as neuro-sig.
Please let me know what you think, and I'll get back to Jonathan.
[1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/...
Thanks for bringing this up, Sandro :)
Pandas is quite a general package that's commonly used by lots of other Python packages. It isn't exactly neuroscience specific, it's more like numpy.
So, I think we can perhaps help co-maintain it, but we probably don't want to be the main maintainers/admins, since it is a dep for us and we'd rather folks that actively use it directly maintain it?
Jonathan will be the admin maintainer. Being co-maintainer will keep us in the loop of updates for (almost) free. ;)
List of packages depending on python3-pandas is attached.
Quite a list. How many of these are, roughly, neuro-sig specific? Ballpark figure will do.
I plan on getting back to Jonathan at the end of the week. In case others would like to chime in.
-- Sandro
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 21:05:07 +0200, Sandro wrote:
<snip>
Jonathan will be the admin maintainer. Being co-maintainer will keep us in the loop of updates for (almost) free. ;)
Sure, that sounds fine, just as long as we're not the primary people who are expected to take care of the package---we have 300 packages of our own to look after :)
List of packages depending on python3-pandas is attached.
Quite a list. How many of these are, roughly, neuro-sig specific? Ballpark figure will do.
Not sure, but you can check our package list here: https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/blob/main/f/package-list/list.txt
or here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/group/neuro-sig
I plan on getting back to Jonathan at the end of the week. In case others would like to chime in.
Sounds good, thanks for doing this.
neurofedora@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Ankur Sinha -
Sandro