On Aug. 8, 2013, 8:27 a.m., Jan Safranek wrote:
> mof/60_LMI_Software.mof, line 1012
>
<
http://reviewboard-openlmi.rhcloud.com/r/683/diff/1/?file=3930#file3930li...
>
> does it make sense to put job here? Instances of this class *are* properties of
the job... I did not put jobs here in Storage.
You are right. Makes no sense :). Thanks for observation.
- Michal
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-openlmi.rhcloud.com/r/683/#review882
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Aug. 8, 2013, 8:04 a.m., Michal Minar wrote:
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-openlmi.rhcloud.com/r/683/
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated Aug. 8, 2013, 8:04 a.m.)
Review request for OpenLMI Developers.
Repository: openlmi-providers
Description
-------
software: added classes for asynchronous methods
Pegasus does not support instances of unknown classes, that's why we
need to define additional classes representing parameters of
asynchronous methods. These will be used in
LMI_ConcreteJob.JobOutParameters and CIM_InstMethodCall.MethodParameters
properties.
Diffs
-----
mof/60_LMI_Software.mof bb02e3f17f52c6c76cb62868fc0f7613d52dbcf6
Diff:
http://reviewboard-openlmi.rhcloud.com/r/683/diff/
Testing
-------
Thanks,
Michal Minar