package-review April 2006

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
906 discussions

[Bug 183912] Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jack-audio-connection-kit - The Jack Audio Connection Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183912 ------- Additional Comments From seg(a)haxxed.com 2006-04-29 17:25 EST ------- Alright, I'm working on a full review. rpmlint output: rpmlint jack-audio-connection-kit-0.101.1-4.fc5.i386.rpm W: jack-audio-connection-kit no-version-in-last-changelog Remember to tag your changelog entries with the package version number, like so: * Thu Apr 27 2006 Andy Shevchenko <andriy(a)asplinux.com.ua> - 0.101.1-4 W: jack-audio-connection-kit one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig W: jack-audio-connection-kit one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig I don't know why mock is complaining. You've got exactly whats in ScriptletSnippets. Ignore it? rpmlint jack-audio-connection-kit-devel-0.101.1-4.fc5.i386.rpm W: jack-audio-connection-kit-devel no-version-in-last-changelog Ditto. rpmlint jack-audio-connection-kit-example-clients-0.101.1-4.fc5.i386.rpm W: jack-audio-connection-kit-example-clients no-version-in-last-changelog Ditto. W: jack-audio-connection-kit-example-clients no-documentation Ignorable. Also, I notice the man page for jackstart is getting installed even though the binary isn't. Looks like that's ultimately an upstream bug. And I see a %{__make} macro in there, as far as I know its useless, and its also inconsistent with the rest of the spec. Just use plain make. My preference would be to not use %{name} in source lines. And maybe not even in the subpackage Requires:. It should be unlikely that the package name would ever change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 172755] Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xcompmgr - X11 composite manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172755 ------- Additional Comments From kevin(a)tummy.com 2006-04-29 16:21 EST ------- In answer to comment #17: Well, the package doesn't mention the license as being STL, but look at: http://www.mcda.org/help/stl.html and then diff it vs the license in this package and the first part is identical, then this package has "...and that the name of Keith Packard not be used in advertising or publicity pertaining to distribution of the software without specific, written prior permission. Keith Packard makes no representations about the suitability of this software for any purpose. It is provided "as is" without express or implied warranty." So I think it's much closer to the STL license than the MIT one. Any license gurus out there that can chime in? In refrence to comment #18: Which CVS repo are you looking at? I don't see any changes in the ones I looked at anytime recently (which might be after this release version I guess). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 188625] Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625 j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |190267 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 165314] Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kismet -- A WLAN detector, sniffer and IDS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=165314 enrico.scholz(a)informatik.tu-chemnitz.de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From enrico.scholz(a)informatik.tu-chemnitz.de 2006-04-29 13:57 EST ------- Thanks for the review and the patches. My first patchset is in upstream svn and I reported your changes some minutes ago. I did not fixed the -debuginfo bug; IMO it is a minor issue and I am not sure about the impact in the build. Package built for devel branch (after adding a freetype-devel BR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

1 0

[Bug 188178] Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gl - OpenGL binding for Gauche https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188178 Bug 188178 depends on bug 188168, which changed state. Bug 188168 Summary: Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188168 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 188176] Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche-gtk - Gauche extension module to use GTK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188176 Bug 188176 depends on bug 188168, which changed state. Bug 188168 Summary: Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188168 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 188168] Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gauche - Scheme script interpreter with multibyte character handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188168 gemi(a)bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gemi(a)bluewin.ch 2006-04-29 13:44 EST ------- Built successfully on FC-4, FC-5 and FC-6. However, I had to remove _smp_flags. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 190233] New: Review Request: perl-Email-MessageID - Generate world unique message-ids
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190233 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MessageID - Generate world unique message-ids Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-MessageID.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-MessageID-1.31-1.src… Description: Message-ids are optional, but highly recommended, headers that identify a message uniquely. This software generates a unique message-id. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 5

[Bug 190237] New: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Encodings - Unified interface to MIME encoding and decoding
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190237 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Encodings - Unified interface to MIME encoding and decoding Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-MIME-Encodings.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-MIME-Encodings-1.3-1… Description: This module simply wraps "MIME::Base64" and "MIME::QuotedPrint" so that you can throw the contents of a "Content-Transfer-Encoding" header at some text and have the right thing happen. Note: another HTTP::Recorder requirement -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 2

[Bug 190231] New: Review Request: perl-Email-Address - RFC 2822 Address Parsing and Creation
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190231 Summary: Review Request: perl-Email-Address - RFC 2822 Address Parsing and Creation Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info ReportedBy: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com Spec URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-Address.spec SRPM URL: http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-Address-1.80-1.src.r… Description: This class implements a complete RFC 2822 parser that locates email addresses in strings and returns a list of "Email::Address" objects found. Alternatley you may construct objects manually. The goal of this software is to be correct, and very very fast. Note: Will be required by http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTTP-Recorder/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 4

← Newer
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
91
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review April 2006