package-review April 2006

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
906 discussions

[Bug 177556] Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177556 rpm(a)timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From rpm(a)timj.co.uk 2006-04-29 12:29 EST ------- Built OK in devel - job #8524 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 188482] Review Request: scipy-0.4.8
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scipy-0.4.8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188482 bugzilla(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list(a)redhat.com |review(a)redhat.com ------- Additional Comments From ed(a)eh3.com 2006-04-29 11:14 EST ------- Hi Neal, the two URLs return "404 Not Found" for me. Is this submission active? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 177556] Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177556 tibbs(a)math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gdk(a)redhat.com |tibbs(a)math.uh.edu OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 188625] Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

1 0

[Bug 177556] Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mod_extract_forwarded https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177556 rpm(a)timj.co.uk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From rpm(a)timj.co.uk 2006-04-29 05:10 EST ------- Thanks very much for the review Jason. The NEEDSPONSOR blocker is indeed incorrect ; I'll remove it and import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 188625] Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: AllegroOgg - Ogg library for use with the Allegro game library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188625 j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl 2006-04-29 04:46 EST ------- There wasn't much discusion, so I'm going to "fix" this by doing things as suggested in my initial proposal to the list: So there we are 2 different ogg support for use with allegro support libraries both installing: /usr/lib/libalogg.so One of them installs: alogg.h And the other: alogg/alogg.h Which also seems like an accident waiting to happen. I'm thinking of solving this by: -give AllegroOGG a new soname: libAllegroOGG.so, or should I give them both a new name, and in that case what should I use for alogg? -putting all the header files of both in seperate dirs under include: /usr/include/allog/(alogg/alogg.h) /usr/include/AllegroOGG/(allogg.h) -modifying allog-config todo the right thing for alogg -use pkgconfig for AllegroOgg -patch AllegroOGG using programs to use pkgconfig. Currently only raidem can use AllegroOGG (I have a new version ready which adds ogg support as a replacement for the stripped out mp3 support, giving raidem its background music back). I'll post links to a new specfile and SRPM once I'm done, in the mean time I'm resetting this to FE-REVIEW :| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 187964] Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: bsd-games - A collection of text-based games https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187964 j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl 2006-04-29 04:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #37) > (In reply to comment #36) > > > MUST Fix: > > --------- > > * Package must own /usr/share/bsd-games > > Good catch. It's owned now. > Wouldn't it be easier to just write: %{_datadir}/bsd-games Instead of all those seperate entreis for files and dirs under it in the %files section? Anyways all MUST Fix items fixed: _approved_! > > Should Fix: > > ----------- > > * "# It looks like textutils became coreutils at some point. I'm not sure > > # what is needed from it, so I'm commenting it out until I can find out. > > #Requires: textutils" > In that case concider dropping these 3 lines from the spec? > > * Shouldn't the highscore files be marked %config(noreplace) ? > > I say no. If the high score file formats changes at any time then we want to > make sure that the old ones get removed. We could mark them as %config only, > but that seems pointless because the only reason to preserve the old scoreboard > files is if a migration tool is also provided to move it to the new format, and > I don't see that happening for any of these games. > Do you concider the changing of these files format likely? If you don't makr them %config(noreplace) the highscores will get reset on each package update, I don't think you / we want that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 188208] Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wings - A polygon mesh modeler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188208 gemi(a)bluewin.ch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From gemi(a)bluewin.ch 2006-04-29 03:26 EST ------- Builds fine on FC-4, FC-5 and FC-6. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 ------- Additional Comments From dragoran(a)feuerpokemon.de 2006-04-29 02:03 EST ------- x86_64 bug is fixed for upstream initng-ifiles too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 188496] Review Request: PyQt-qscintilla
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Apr '06

29 Apr '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PyQt-qscintilla https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188496 bugzilla(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |list(a)redhat.com |review(a)redhat.com tibbs(a)math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs(a)math.uh.edu ------- Additional Comments From tibbs(a)math.uh.edu 2006-04-29 00:26 EST ------- Just took a quick look but I can't fetch the upstream source. It looks like they don't distribute 3.15 any longer. Now, if I understand things, this is just building some extra files that aren't included in the Core PyQt package. (They couldn't be; qscintilla is in Extras.) So the version of PyQt used here has to be exactly the same as the version that Core used for their packages. If so then we'll have to make an exception for the need for upstream sources. Just for grins I tried to build in rawhide; the build fails in configure.py. It builds fine on FC5 x86_64 (in mock). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
...
91
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review April 2006