Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-Readonly
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=172677
------- Additional Comments From rc040203(a)freenet.de 2005-11-12 23:51 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
I think the bundling makes sense in this case.
I could not
disagree more.
* Readonly-XS and Readonly are independent, there is no dependency between both.
Actually, Readonly-XS is a sort of overlay plugin to Readonly
* Readonly is noarch/Readonly-XS is arch'ed.
Probs will occur, should Readonly-XS not be buildable on one particular
architecture.
* Splitting both makes the *specs much simpler and less error-prone.
=> There is no technically need to merge these perl-dists into one, therefore
there is no need to make an exception from the FE packaging rules.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.