Hey folks! Just a heads up that I'm moving all the repos I maintain to the fedora-qa space on Pagure. That includes:
(python-)wikitcms relval fedfind testdays
The new projects will be:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/python-wikitcms https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relval https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedfind https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/testdays
testdays is already migrated, and I'm in the middle of doing wikitcms now (renaming it as it goes). The others I'll get to later today I hope.
The pages for each tool on happyassassin.net will go away and the URLs will simply redirect to the Pagure project pages.
I plan to push a final commit to each repo on happyassassin.net/cgit which will just have a 'MOVED' file or something with the Pagure project info. (Except I haven't bothered for 'testdays', because it's a small thing I don't think anyone else really uses). I'll leave that up for a few weeks or something, then kill cgit from happyassassin entirely.
This saves me maintaining the cgit setup and the front pages, and means there's now a handy place to file issues and pull requests for each project; I'm going to remove the Phabricator issue / PR tracking for these and just go with Pagure, unless anyone yells that they really want to be able to send issues/PRs via Phab.
I guess we should also migrate the stuff from https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ soon.
Thanks folks!
Hey folks! Just a heads up that I'm moving all the repos I maintain to the fedora-qa space on Pagure. That includes:
(python-)wikitcms relval fedfind testdays
The new projects will be:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/python-wikitcms https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relval https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedfind https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/testdays
I'm not sure how Pagure works exactly internally, but even though 'fedora-qa' is in the URL (or in the project name?), 'fedora-qa' group doesn't seem to own the projects:
https://pagure.io/group/fedora-qa
If it was your intention to move them under the group ownership, this needs to be adjusted somehow. Maybe changing the project owner or at least putting 'fedora-qa' group to projects admins/committers would do the trick?
Either way, it's somewhat confusing that the project URL can contain a user/group which in fact doesn't own the project at all. Maybe it would be worth filing a RFE/bug report.
On Mon, 2016-10-17 at 07:42 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
Hey folks! Just a heads up that I'm moving all the repos I maintain to the fedora-qa space on Pagure. That includes:
(python-)wikitcms relval fedfind testdays
The new projects will be:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/python-wikitcms https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relval https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/fedfind https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/testdays
I'm not sure how Pagure works exactly internally, but even though 'fedora-qa' is in the URL (or in the project name?), 'fedora-qa' group doesn't seem to own the projects:
When you create a project in Pagure it lets you put it in a 'namespace'. I chose to put them all in the fedora-qa 'namespace' - it just seemed to make sense, and I don't like the non-namespaced projects as they're too prone to name collisions.
https://pagure.io/group/fedora-qa
If it was your intention to move them under the group ownership,
It wasn't, really, though if people would like me to do it, I could...
qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org