qa-devel November 2013

qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

8 participants
47 discussions

[Fedora QA] #436: SSH access to systems in Beaker lab
by fedora-badges 20 Apr '16

20 Apr '16

#436: SSH access to systems in Beaker lab --------------------------------------+--------------------- Reporter: atodorov | Owner: tflink Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Blocker bug tracker page | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | --------------------------------------+--------------------- = bug description = Currently systems in Beaker lab can be accessed only through bastion.fp.o which is not as convenient as direct SSH into the system. There's also the question whether or not to open the systems directly to the Internet. This needs to be discussed with infra. Filing here so it doesn't get lost. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/436> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 4

[Fedora QA] #437: Need to import daily Fedora snapshots into Beaker
by fedora-badges 29 Jan '15

29 Jan '15

#437: Need to import daily Fedora snapshots into Beaker --------------------------------------+--------------------- Reporter: atodorov | Owner: tflink Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Blocker bug tracker page | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | --------------------------------------+--------------------- = bug description = In order to perform any meaningfull testing Beaker needs to import more recent Fedora trees. It could be daily(nightly) snapshots or less often depending on available resources. The tree directory structure needs to be a copy/snapshot of the current state at the time of import. The reason is b/c devel trees utilize one URL but the contents under this URL are updated in a rolling fashion. We need tree URLs where content is not changing in order to produce consistent test results. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/437> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 1

[Fedora QA] #433: blocker proposal form forgets everything after login timeout
by fedora-badges 20 Jan '15

20 Jan '15

#433: blocker proposal form forgets everything after login timeout --------------------------------------+--------------------- Reporter: kvolny | Owner: tflink Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Blocker bug tracker page | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | --------------------------------------+--------------------- = bug description = I was trying to propose a F20 blocker. I needed to gather information from multiple bugs, so it took me longer to write the justification. After finishing and submitting that, I was presented with a login screen. After logging in again, I was redirected to the proposal form again, but it was completely empty, all the text that took me so long to write was gone. (Okay, I'm a smart guy and I had it in clipboard for such case, but if I had forgotten ... booh.) = bug analysis = Seems the login code doesn't care about other variables in the http request ... = fix recommendation = 1) If there is such a short login timeout, the user should be warned about it (e.g. countdown timer on the page) and the page should allow refresh without submitting the data. 2) Once the login expires, the submitted data should be caried over all the redirects back to the submission form. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/433> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 2

Review Request 37: Fix sequences in alembic
by Martin Krizek 21 Feb '14

21 Feb '14

----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/37/ ----------------------------------------------------------- Review request for blockerbugs. Repository: blockerbugs Description ------- commit abf5fe2abbcfbce45d103864f5ba40fc89f233fa Author: Martin Krizek <mkrizek(a)redhat.com> Date: Tue Jul 16 13:57:28 2013 +0200 Fix sequences in alembic Sequences need to be created separately. The patch also fixes a few typos. https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/alembic/issue/73/more-pg-nextval-it-needs-the-… Diffs ----- alembic/versions/487cb8ccce92_dropping_flask_login.py e64dacb2e3b1a3d14bf38e1116df183ded9793d9 alembic/versions/1d12b74d12bd_add_userinfo_table.py 86dc390ed5e49b0a3ca058e163bc02b070d3d294 Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/37/diff/ Testing ------- Thanks, Martin Krizek

1 4

[Maniphest] [Created] T24: Insufficient logging for bug proposal form issues
by tflink (Tim Flink) 15 Jan '14

15 Jan '14

tflink created this task. tflink added a subscriber: tflink. tflink added a project: blockerbugs TASK DESCRIPTION I got a report of a failed proposal today where the form said there were errors but everything looks fine and no details were provided. There is currently no logging of form errors in the app, and that would have been useful in this case. If there's one report, I suspect that there have been other form validation failures which have gone unreported. Attached to this bug is screenshot of what the user reported {F10} TASK DETAIL https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T24 To: tflink Cc: qa-devel, tflink

1 3

[Maniphest] [Created] T21: Do not display obsolete and deleted updates
by tflink (Tim Flink) 14 Jan '14

14 Jan '14

mkrizek created this task. mkrizek claimed this task. mkrizek added a subscriber: mkrizek. mkrizek added a project: blockerbugs TASK DESCRIPTION Currently, the app knows of no way how to deal with updates that were deleted from bodhi. This results in displaying deleted update as a potential fix for a bug. Also, the app display an obsolete update as a potential fix which it shouldn't. The update sync code should go through the updates stored in the app's db and somehow mark those that were no longer present in bodhi or that have status 'obsolete' as 'do not display'. TASK DETAIL https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T21 To: mkrizek Cc: qa-devel, mkrizek

1 2

[Maniphest] [Created] T20: Use config files to point to repodata locations in depcheck mk 2
by tflink (Tim Flink) 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

jdulaney created this task. jdulaney claimed this task. jdulaney added a subscriber: qa-devel. jdulaney added a project: depcheck mk 2 TASK DESCRIPTION Currently, depcheck mk 2 uses essentially hard coded links to repodata; better solution is to put these into a config file. Use yum.repos style so that yum configs can be copied in. TASK DETAIL https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/T20 To: jdulaney Cc: qa-devel

1 2

[Fedora QA] #381: Bug and Update syncs shouldn't be halted by an isolated problem with one update or bug
by fedora-badges 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

#381: Bug and Update syncs shouldn't be halted by an isolated problem with one update or bug --------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Undetermined Future Component: Blocker bug tracker page | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | --------------------------------------+---------------------------------- = problem = The current bug and update sync algorithms are very fragile in that one error will stop the entire sync algorithm, leaving stuff out of sync with bodhi or bugzilla. This has caused problems in the past = analysis = This could be solved by better error handling in the sync process such that an error is logged but doesn't bubble up to the main sync code and halt the entire process. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/381> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 1

[Fedora QA] #384: Improve documentation
by fedora-badges 13 Jan '14

13 Jan '14

#384: Improve documentation --------------------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 20 Component: Blocker bug tracker page | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | --------------------------------------+------------------------ = problem = At the moment, our documentation is out of date and somewhat incomplete. = analysis = Update the docs and find an appropriate place for them to live. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/384> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 1

[Fedora QA] #438: Multiple builds fixing a bug show confusing status label
by fedora-badges 16 Dec '13

16 Dec '13

#438: Multiple builds fixing a bug show confusing status label --------------------------------------+--------------------- Reporter: kparal | Owner: tflink Type: defect | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: Blocker bug tracker page | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | --------------------------------------+--------------------- See the screenshot. There are two updates that claim to fix a single bug (that is correct, both of them are needed). One is stable, one is in testing. The BBA shows [stable] label. That is confusing, that seems to indicate that everything needed is in stable. (One might happen to visit that bug and close it, without inspecting it closer). I think a better choice here is to show the "worst" status in the label. Therefore: {{{ update X: stable update Y: testing -> label: [testing] update X: stable update Y: stable -> label: [stable] update X: pending testing update Y: testing -> label: [pending testing] update X: pending stable update Y: testing -> label: [testing] update X: stable update Y: pending stable -> label: [pending stable] }}} So, if you have an ordered array ['pending testing', 'testing', 'pending stable', 'stable'], you pick the lowest index available in update XYZ statuses and show that as the label. What do you think? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/438> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

qa-devel November 2013