[Bug 452544] New: HDD requirements very deprecated
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452544
Summary: HDD requirements very deprecated
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: msamia(a)redhat.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Very deprecated information about disk space requirements
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Chapter 6 (Architecture Specific Notes)
How reproducible:
Try to install a full installation on a pc with 30GB HDD.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. perform a standard F9 installation on PC with 30GB HDD
2. $ su
3. # yum --skip-broken install '*'
4. wait few hours (depends on your system, I highly recommend use a local
intranet mirror...)
Actual results:
Installation of package '(something)' requires 4 GB HDD space...
Expected results:
Correct information about HDD requirements in chapter 6 (30 GB was not enough..)
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
15 years, 8 months
[Bug 243190] New: Relase notes imply you need to be a KDE user to use K3B
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243190
Summary: Relase notes imply you need to be a KDE user to use K3B
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
URL: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/f7/en_US/sn-
Multimedia.html#sn-CD-DVD-Authoring-and-Burning
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: allenhalsey(a)gmail.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
Fedora 7 relase notes section 16.4. on CD and DVD Authoring and Burning states:
"GNOME users can burn directly from the Nautilus file manager, choose the
gnomebaker or graveman packages, or utilize the older xcdroast package from
Fedora. KDE users can use the robust k3b package for these tasks."
This incorrectly implies that you need to be a KDE user to use k3b, when, in
fact, k3b is popular with many Gnome users. Similarly, GTK-based applications,
like graveman, can be run within the KDE environment.
It is not necessary to make a KDE versus Gnome distinction when selecting
applications. Interoperability between the various X Window System desktop
applications is primary goal of the freedesktop project.
Allen Halsey
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
15 years, 8 months
[Bug 229872] New: For F8 test1, have drop-in HTML page for Anaconda
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229872
Summary: For F8 test1, have drop-in HTML page for Anaconda
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: stickster(a)gmail.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
Anaconda needs a "filler" HTML page for release notes. If we can't get the
one-sheet into fedora-release-notes in a timely basis, let's at least have a
small note here that redirects people to the one-sheet canonical page (currently
the wiki) for information.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
15 years, 8 months
[Bug 449060] New: release notes to need mention missing /etc/modprobe.conf
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449060
Summary: release notes to need mention missing /etc/modprobe.conf
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: release-notes
AssignedTo: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: joshua(a)iwsp.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
release notes to need mention missing /etc/modprobe.conf... before references
writing or appending to it. A reference as to why it isn't created by default
might make sense here as well
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
F9 release-notes
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
15 years, 9 months
[Bug 280251] pilot-link configuration is incomplete
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: pilot-link configuration is incomplete
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280251
------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla(a)krp.org.uk 2008-06-24 05:33 EST -------
(In reply to comment #173)
> I'll have sporadic Internet access for
> about a week. If the hal-info build gets pushed soon, I'll apply the latest
> patch and do at least a scratch build.
Alex, appreciate you may be offline - so don't know if you saw that the
requisite hal and hal-info builds went into updates-testing on Friday. So we're
good to get a patched pilot-link in there too...?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 10 months
[Bug 280251] pilot-link configuration is incomplete
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: pilot-link configuration is incomplete
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280251
------- Additional Comments From alexl(a)users.sourceforge.net 2008-06-19 05:21 EST -------
I'm leaving for a conference tomorrow but I'll have sporadic Internet access for
about a week. If the hal-info build gets pushed soon, I'll apply the latest
patch and do at least a scratch build.
As for the Requires, that probably isn't necessary since it is (or should be) a
transient issue and it shouldn't be necessary to maintain that in the .spec file
for very long.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 10 months
[Bug 280251] pilot-link configuration is incomplete
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: pilot-link configuration is incomplete
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280251
------- Additional Comments From redhat-bugzilla(a)krp.org.uk 2008-06-19 04:00 EST -------
Ok, so Richard confirms in bug #244995 that we'll get a rebuild of hal-info. Can
we have a scratch build ready to push to updates-testing when that happens?
(people can still get the obsoleted hal-info to test with from koji if they like)
hal-info has a date derived version. Could/should a
Requires: hal-info >= 20080227
be added to the F-8 pilot-link spec file?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 10 months