[Bug 1001355] New: No Default Syslog
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001355
Bug ID: 1001355
Summary: No Default Syslog
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, mattdm(a)redhat.com,
relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998573
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998573 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: No Default Syslog
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSyslog
No longer install a traditional syslog service by default. (Specifically,
remove rsyslog from the @core or @standard groups in comps.)
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185329.html
Please create entries for this Change in the Release Notes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
10 years, 3 months
[Bug 1021132] New: Shared Certificate Tools
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021132
Bug ID: 1021132
Summary: Shared Certificate Tools
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: herrold(a)owlriver.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com,
relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, stefw(a)redhat.com,
wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998546
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998546 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Shared Certificate Tools
For more details, see:
http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/SharedCertificateTools
Fedora now has infrastructure for sharing system trusted certificates between
the various crypto libraries.
--- Additional comment from Stef Walter on 2013-08-29 08:32:51 EDT ---
Substantiably testable using p11-kit-0.19.4 which is in Fedora 20.
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:46:13 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100%
Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1].
All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be
validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required
bug state at this point is ON_QA.
As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a
point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be
reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any
questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik).
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule
----------------
Tracking bug for representation in the Release Notes.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998546
[Bug 998546] Shared Certificate Tools
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
10 years, 3 months
[Bug 1021138] New: Sugar 0.100 (1.0)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021138
Bug ID: 1021138
Summary: Sugar 0.100 (1.0)
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, pbrobinson(a)gmail.com,
relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998549
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998549 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Sugar 0.100 (1.0)
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Sugar-0.100
Update Sugar to the new upstream 0.100 (1.0) release.
--- Additional comment from Peter Robinson on 2013-08-23 05:48:46 EDT ---
Feature is substantially complete. We're still awaiting the upstream final
0.100 (or 1.0) release but it's all working in Fedora on the current latest
release
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:46:17 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100%
Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1].
All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be
validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required
bug state at this point is ON_QA.
As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a
point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be
reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any
questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik).
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule
---------------------
Tracking bug for documenting this Change in the Release Notes.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998549
[Bug 998549] Sugar 0.100 (1.0)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
10 years, 3 months
[Bug 1008194] New: Enlightenment
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008194
Bug ID: 1008194
Summary: Enlightenment
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: jreznik(a)redhat.com, metherid(a)gmail.com,
relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org, wb8rcr(a)arrl.net,
zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 954132 (Enlightenment-Tracker), 998517
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998517 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: Enlightenment
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/Enlightenment
Enlightenment 0.17 a new stable release has been released after 12 years or so
of development. As many desktops are being landed on Fedora, Integrating
Enlightenment in Fedora can not only enlarge the number of available desktops
in Fedora, but also improve user experiences and give users another choice of
Desktop Environment.
------------------------
Discussion at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-July/001210...
Please document this Change in the Release Notes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
10 years, 4 months
[Bug 1021151] New: X2Go
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021151
Bug ID: 1021151
Summary: X2Go
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Keywords: Tracking
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: me(a)petetravis.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: cickumqt(a)gmail.com, jreznik(a)redhat.com,
orion(a)cora.nwra.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org,
wb8rcr(a)arrl.net, zach(a)oglesby.co
Depends On: 998551, 969209, 969212, 969220, 990815, 990817,
991286, 991292, 1004094
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #998551 +++
This is a tracking bug for Change: X2Go
For more details, see: http://fedoraproject.org//wiki/Changes/X2Go
The X2Go project has taken over development of the old NX libraries and has
developed new clients and server code around it. We will move to use the X2Go
NX library in Fedora and include the full X2Go suite.
--- Additional comment from Orion Poplawski on 2013-08-22 11:20:42 EDT ---
Review of main nx-libs component is stalled.
--- Additional comment from Orion Poplawski on 2013-08-31 00:11:58 EDT ---
We seem to be making progress again. Current issues:
- nx-libs should be approved soon
- x2goclient is blocking on a bundled library exception -
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/343
- remmina-plugins-nx and qtnx will need to require nxproxy
- freenx-server will need to require nxagent
As a proven packager I can make the above two changes once nx-libs is imported.
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-11 04:44:45 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 20 Accepted Changes 100%
Completed Deadline is on 2013-10-15 [1].
All Accepted Changes has to be code complete and ready to be
validated in the Beta release (optionally by Fedora QA). Required
bug state at this point is ON_QA.
As for several System Wide Changes, Beta Change Deadline is a
point of contingency plan, all incomplete Changes will be
reported to FESCo for 2013-10-16 meeting. In case of any
questions, don't hesitate to ask Wrangler (jreznik).
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule
--- Additional comment from Jaroslav Reznik on 2013-10-14 10:28:01 EDT ---
Orion, I can see all tracker bugs closed. Does this mean this Change is
completed now and could be moved to ON_QA?
--- Additional comment from Orion Poplawski on 2013-10-14 15:05:26 EDT ---
yes, I think so.
=============================
Tracking bug for inclusion in Release Notes
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969209
[Bug 969209] Review Request: nx-libs - NX X11 protocol compression
libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969212
[Bug 969212] Review Request: x2goclient - Graphical client for use with the
X2Go network based computing environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969220
[Bug 969220] Review Request: x2goserver - Server for use with the X2Go
network based computing environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990815
[Bug 990815] Review Request: x2godesktopsharing - Share X2go desktops with
other users
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=990817
[Bug 990817] Review Request: python-x2go - Python module providing X2Go
client API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991286
[Bug 991286] Review Request: pyhoca-gui - Graphical X2Go client written in
(wx)Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991292
[Bug 991292] Review Request: pyhoca-cli - Command line X2Go client written
in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998551
[Bug 998551] X2Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1004094
[Bug 1004094] Review Request: cups-x2go - CUPS backend for printing from
X2Go
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
10 years, 4 months
[Bug 977413] New: named: "PID file has been moved to /run/named/named.pid" should be documented
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977413
Bug ID: 977413
Summary: named: "PID file has been moved to
/run/named/named.pid" should be documented
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Component: release-notes
Severity: high
Priority: unspecified
Assignee: relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: thozza(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: docs-qa(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
CC: oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com, relnotes(a)fedoraproject.org,
wb8rcr(a)arrl.net
Description of problem:
Since F19 the named PID file has been moved from default location
(/var/run/named/named.pid) to new location (/run/named/named.pid).
If someone is using custom named.conf based on older Fedora (before F19),
then they need to add a pid-file statement into options section to point
to the new PID file location.
options {
...
pid-file "/run/named/named.pid";
...
};
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 19
Actual results:
No documentation.
Expected results:
Release note informing about this change or it should be somewhere documented.
Additional info:
There is already F19 Bug #977191 cased by not informed user. Sorry for the late
Bug. The change was made by previous maintainer and I'm not aware of any
existing note warning about this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
10 years, 5 months