On Thursday 09 March 2006 14:37, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 22:14 +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> Why is that? I would MUCH prefer if discussions would be kept on-list.
> Apologies if this was explained earlier, I missed the first few posts
> here.
I guess it depends on how we use this list. We may want to ping for
somebody to help with a given package, but not want to have a public
record of the discussion of sensitive matter until such time as updates
are prepared. I don't want to see this list become a place for hackers
to listen in on what packages are known to be flawed.
We definetly do not want
this. a private list is probably needed for such
things perhaps becoming public after 30 -60 days
It took me VERY little time to get used to <ctrl>l to reply
list. I am
on a LOT of lists and not all are configured the same. Remembering
<ctrl>l for every list will always do the right thing wrt replying to
the list. There are other RFE matters against munging the reply-to
headers, but that's an exercise for the bored. I've voiced my opinion,
others can do the same.
kmail you just hit l to reply to list
no i just need to make sure i always select the right profile or setup the
folder for the list so its done for me :)
Dennis