Re: postfix high-ports prob
Hi;
Thx for the Hint (amvis ports). I stick with clamsmtp since its working
quite well 4 me. Its a little C Programm without overhead (vs
interpreter), no dependence flood (perl modules) and i am not so much a
perl fan ....
hb
Am Sonntag, den 12.03.2006, 00:26 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot:
Le samedi 11 mars 2006 à 10:01 -0500, Daniel J Walsh a écrit :
> Holger Burde wrote:
> > Hi;
> >
> > FC 4 currrent with targeted - up2date & unmodified.
> >
> > The postfix Policy or some other seems 2 prevent binding postfix to
> > unpriv Ports > 1023 (10026 in my case). Is this intentional and if why ?
> > Daemon based Filtering stuff needs those high-ports.
> > Since after setting setenforce to 0 it works i think i must be policy
> > related (the system has no source policy - so i didn't dig into that
> > yet).
> >
> > Mar 11 14:06:40 proton postfix/master[3413]: fatal: bind 127.0.0.1 port
> > 10026: Permission denied
>
> Well you have two choices. You can update to FC5 and use some of the
> semanage to add additional ports
> to postfix.
Actually this is a postfix/filter communication problem, it works fine
in FC4/5 with postfix<->amavid-new, so what you actually need is use the
same ports as amavisd-new and eventually apply amavis contexts to your
filter
(another solution is to just use amavisd-new now it's in FE)
--
--- -- -
Dipl. Inform. H. Burde
EMail : <hburde(a)t-online.de>| <hburde(a)uni-bremen.de>