I wonder about step 2. below. If you have the latest (and even just a
recent) kernel, all of the SELinux patches are in the kernel already.
[doing the patches by hand after looking them over is always a good idea
for a secure system, but if you just want to get things up for a sanity
check, maybe not necessary at the moment..]
Bringing your system up2date is also a good idea as some of the utilities
(nptd?) have SELinux related patches.
I also think that step 5. needs to be done before steps 3 and 4.
You might boot a couple of times with 5. set, then do 3. and 4.
At least that is what I have done.
BobG
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:18:17 +0200, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
OK, so I'm trying SElinux after having it disabled for some time.
That's what I did:
1. Installed selinux-policy-targeted-1.17.16-2
2. Recompiled the kernel with SElinux support
3. Booted into single user mode
4. Ran "fixfiles relabel"
5. Rebooted with "selinux=1"
Now, I'm seeing a lot of these:
audit(1095681913.039:0(: avc: denied { search } for pid=2515
exe=/usr/sbin/ntpd dev=tmpfs ino=357 scontext=user_u:system_r:ntpd_t
tcontext=user_u:object_r"tmpfs_t tclass=dir
The problem here is that I'm using UDEV and that the initial ramdisk
mounts a tmpfs on top of "/dev", thus, covering the labeled "/dev"
that
resides on disk.
How should I fix this?
--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list(a)redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list