Re: Moving /etc/fonts/ to fonts_t?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Jan Kasprzak wrote:
> In my Fedora 10 system, all fonts under /usr/share/fonts
> are of the fonts_t type, while the fontconfig files under /etc/fonts
> are of the default etc_t type. I think it would make sense to move
> the whole /etc/fonts directory under the fonts_t type, so that user
> can easily say "this domain can use fonts" and be done without allowing
> the domain to read the whole /etc directory and files.
> What do you think about it? Does it make sense to modify the default
> Fedora policy according to these lines?
> -Yenya
yes. If there are fonts in /etc/fonts it should be labeled fonts_t
if they are not
fonts though lots of domains can write to fonts_t
- --
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkmxLkAACgkQrlYvE4MpobN9rQCbBq51YaslKt7yHf5ZACOXv8Yk
iBYAnRTuU4dIgEHD15t4BgVxDOWv6aQ6
=xcLX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----