Daniel wrote:
On 05/27/2010 04:12 PM, m.roth(a)5-cent.us wrote:
> Daniel wrote:
>> On 05/27/2010 02:38 PM, m.roth(a)5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Daniel wrote:
>>>> On 05/27/2010 12:19 PM, m.roth(a)5-cent.us wrote:
>>>>> Daniel wrote:
>>>>>> On 05/27/2010 12:00 PM, m.roth(a)5-cent.us wrote:
>>>>>>> Daniel wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 05/27/2010 11:49 AM, m.roth(a)5-cent.us wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Updating a system from CentOS 5.4 (current) to 5.5,
and I see:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> libsepol.scope_copy_callback: zosremote: Duplicate
declaration
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> module:
>>>>>>>>> type/attribute zos_remote_t
>>>>>>>>> libsemanage.semanage_link_sandbox: Link packages
failed
>>>>>>>>> semodule: Failed!
>>>>> <snip>
>>>> Remove all audispd-zos-remote.pp and zos_remote.pp
>>>>
>>>> We ship zosremote.pp
>>>
>>> Ok... I can do that, but are you saying to just rm it, and not
>>> whatever package it came in?
<snip>
>> I think you will find that it does not happen for everyone
else and
>> that these files do not belong to other packages. I have a feeling that
>> something went wrong on an update that left these files around.
>>
> Hmmm...but I don't know if rm'ing them will work, if they're in the d/b.
> So I suppose I'll have to find the package that put them there...
> <time passes>
> Ok, anyone on the CentOS list: does *anyone* know where this came from?
> It' sin the directory provided by
> selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-279.el5.noarch, but there's no zos_remote
> in the package.
>
Trust me on this, I know what I am talking about.
Just remove them. They were put there by previous versions of audit and
maybe selinux-policy. If you are concerned you can squirrel them away.
selinux-policy takes all pp files in the active directory and compiles
them into a policy module.
Ok, I believe you. I also found the same .pp in .../previous/, and diff
said no difference, so no problem rm'ing them.
mark