--- On Fri, 4/20/12, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
From: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com>
Subject: Re:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812100
To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
<test(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Cc: "Antonio Olivares" <olivares14031(a)yahoo.com>, "Selinux List at
Fedora Project" <selinux(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Date: Friday, April 20, 2012, 5:37 AM
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Somehow /etc/ld.so.cache file got mislabeled? Was this an
initial install?
Install from livecd?
Installed from nightly build before rc4 and/or beta was released.
Running restorecon on /etc/ld.so.cache
will fix the
label, as the setroubleshoot tells you. Does the file become
mislabeled again?
Will try it later tonight and see what happens.
If we could figure out how it got mislabeled we would gladly
fixed it, if we
get one bug from one person reporting a file is mislabeled,
and do not hear
about it from others, we assume it is a one off and tell the
user to follow
what setroubleshoot told them to do. If we see it repeatedly
or from multiple
users we will do our best to investigate what is going on.
We have a rule in policy now that says if any unconfined
domain creates this
file it will get labeled correctly, This include
unconfined_t, initrc_t,
rpm_t, rpm_script_t. So I do not know how it got mislabeled.
Does the file
first get created with a different name and then renamed to
/etc/ld.so.cache_t?
Regards,
Antonio