Re: Summary of Informal SELinux Meeting on May 6, 2004
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 21:31, Stephen Smalley <sds(a)epoch.ncsc.mil> wrote:
I think Frank Mayer of Tresys has previously suggested using
"trustworthy" vs. "trusted" to distinguish the cases noted by
Russell.
That use of the word "trustworthy" seems reasonable. But as long as the word
"trusted" is used in it's current manner in terms of computer security there
will be confusion.
Any suggestions of a term we can use as a synonym for the current use of
"trusted" to reduce confusion?
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page