Re: /dev/shm - tmpfs_t or device_t ?
Tom London wrote:
Running latest Rawhide, targeted/enforcing.
I notice that if I run 'restorecon -v -R -n /dev' I get:
[root@localhost ~]# restorecon -v -R -n /dev
restorecon reset /dev/shm context
system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0->system_u:object_r:device_t:s0
[root@localhost ~]#
but
[root@localhost ~]# ls -ldZ /dev/shm
drwxrwxrwt root root system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t /dev/shm
[root@localhost ~]#
Seems funny to me.... Is that right?
i found your resorecon command run with "-n", that option means:
-n don't change any file labels.
additionally, i found there are not any label in file_contexts,
so i think if there no type_transition rules in policy, the file
label should be inherited from his containing dir, i.e. device_t
tom