On 06/13/2014 09:46 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 11:47:18AM -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> So when I look at it for me it makes perfect sense to continue investing
> into libini to address its cons, i.e. if we contribute to it we will
> foster a community for it.
At the same time, do you propose to also work enhancing Augeas
sssd.conf lens to perhaps support things it cannot do today? For
puppet-based projects and products, expressing the sssd.conf changes
using Augeas is the most native way.
I propose to vote by code and do both.
--
Thank you,
Dmitri Pal
Sr. Engineering Manager IdM portfolio
Red Hat, Inc.