On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 14:43 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 06:02:45AM -0400, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> seems OK but could you also add similar treatment for etc_shells? There are few rare
cases when out of memory situations could make nctx->etc_shells NULL.
>
We handle OOM when loading the etc_shells array but more checks never
hurt, I guess.
Ack.