On (26/05/15 20:49), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 05/26/2015 07:56 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (26/05/15 13:03), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>>On 05/26/2015 09:25 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>It's better to do not mix utility functions.
>>>So feel free to split file to subfiles if it will be used among many files
>>>or include helper function directly to module. You can later extract helper
>>>function to another utility module when there will be use case.
>>>(run_shell is not used atm)
>>>
>>>And here are proposed names. string_utils | utils_string | utils.string,
>>>shell_utils (python already has shutil) ...
>>
>>Hmm, you asked me to change the "misc.py" name, but now you're
suggesting we
>>should split it. Is it really worth it for three tiny functions? What if we
>>just rename it to "util.py", or some other name which you find more
suitable?
>>
>OK, it does not worth to block patches
Thank you :) Would you still like me to rename the file?
Yes, please.
LS