On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 05:12:25PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> An engineer from the BaseOS QE team found out that the SSSD does not
> work at all on big endian architectures..
> From d65c01d15839cf06928ef3fa080832e0b669849c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jakub Hrozek <jhrozek(a)redhat.com>
> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:47:58 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] DP: Use the correct type for DBus boolean
>
>
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2057
> ---
> src/responder/common/responder_get_domains.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/responder/common/responder_get_domains.c
b/src/responder/common/responder_get_domains.c
> index
592cd8dcd9e24d56617f85763504b1107e0dfcad..c7f4c36ba2c6c1779ec1de53289c8c99a0feecd4 100644
> --- a/src/responder/common/responder_get_domains.c
> +++ b/src/responder/common/responder_get_domains.c
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static DBusMessage *sss_dp_get_domains_msg(void *pvt);
> struct sss_dp_domains_info {
> struct sss_domain_info *dom;
> const char *hint;
> - bool force;
> + dbus_bool_t force;
> };
>
> static struct tevent_req *
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ get_subdomains_send(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx, struct resp_ctx *rctx,
> goto fail;
> }
> info->hint = hint;
> - info->force = force;
> + info->force = force ? TRUE : FALSE;
wow, good catch, but please add a comment to avoid "optimizations" in
future.
bye,
Sumit
Well, there was a DBus assert-like error message that made my life
easier.
Sure, new patch with a comment is attached.