On 09/30/2015 08:20 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (29/09/15 17:35), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>>On 09/29/2015 05:13 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>>>On 09/29/2015 03:54 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>>ehlo,
>>>>
>>>>I touched the CI script and I found an interesting todo
>>>>
>>>>distro.sh-52-{
>>>>distro.sh-53- declare prompt=$'Need root permissions to install
packages.\n'
>>>>distro.sh-54- prompt+="Enter sudo password for $USER: "
>>>>distro.sh-55- if [[ "$DISTRO_BRANCH" == -redhat-* ]]; then
>>>>distro.sh-56- [ $# != 0 ] && sudo -p "$prompt"
yum --assumeyes install -- "$@" |&
>>>>distro.sh-57- # Pass input to output, fail if a missing package
is reported
>>>>distro.sh-58- # TODO Remove and switch to DNF once
>>>>distro.sh:59: #
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128139 is fixed
>>>>distro.sh-60- awk 'BEGIN {s=0}
>>>>distro.sh-61- /^No package .* available.$/ {s=1}
>>>>distro.sh-62- {print}
>>>>distro.sh-63- END {exit s}'
>>>>distro.sh-64- elif [[ "$DISTRO_BRANCH" == -debian-* ]]; then
>>>>distro.sh-65- [ $# != 0 ] && sudo -p "$prompt"
apt-get --yes install -- "$@"
>>>>distro.sh-66- else
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The BZ1128139 was closed as duplicate of BZ1107737.
>>>>The BZ1107737 was fixed 7 months ago and is available in
>>>>dnf >= 0.6.4-2. The Fedora 21 currently have dnf-0.6.4-7.
>>>>I think it's the best time for removing this todo.
>>>
>>>I would very much like to get rid of it, but unfortunately we're blocked
by
>>>this DNF bug here:
>>>
>>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215208
>>>
>>>Due to this bug we still have to use yum-deprecated on Fedora Rawhide (by
>>>modifying /usr/bin/yum to invoke yum-deprecated instead of dnf) and the bug
>>>mentioned in the TODO wasn't and likely won't be fixed in yum.
>>
>>So, I think we can only update the bug number for now. The patch is attached.
>>
>>Nick
>
>Would you mind open upstream tracking ticket rather then changing
>number of BZ? We have Continuous integration bucket.
I opened the ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2809
However, I think it's better to also update the source, so the next person
reading it doesn't have the same question and/or tries to switch to DNF only
to find another problem, the one described in the bug I mention.
>It's fine there is a plan how to fix BZ1215208 but it would be
also good to
>know what is an ETA (at least approximately :-)
I asked one of the DNF developers in a comment to the DNF bug. Let's see if we
get any answer.