-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/05/2009 05:14 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 10/05/2009 04:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 15:58 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> Consider the case where our backend crashes and is restarted by the
>>> monitor. If we have a busy system where one entry is being requested
>>> continuously, say once per second, and the backend that NSS is
>> talking
>>> to segfaults for some reason, that request would never get a reply,
>> and
>>> the timeout would continue to be extended. Furthermore, all new
>> requests
>>> would just continue to add to the queue of callbacks, never to see
>> the
>>> light of day.
>>>
>>> No, it's much better to just let the first timeout cause all of them
>> to
>>> return immediately, so that a new request can try again.
>>
>> Yeah hadn't thought about it from this pov.
>>
>> Will remove the extending timeout part.
> New revision attached.
> Simo.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list
> sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
Ack.
Pushed to master.
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkrKYhIACgkQeiVVYja6o6OgTwCeIqC2VOPtUv11nVzARxRGno1a
Ir4An3tNwbkWzaWuxWkoY7ydK09aKqLl
=RFJ/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----