On (12/08/16 12:24), Justin Stephenson wrote:
Simple error message patch, resolves
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
Kind regards,
Justin Stephenson
From 080f9639e120329d069d4f0ba5edcc776e0179c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
2001
From: Justin Stephenson <jstephen(a)redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:12:57 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] SSSCTL: More helpful error message when InfoPipe is
disabled
Resolves:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3130
---
src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
index e541c4b27ba38e50b209b0957c8b38f03afc891a..d61754c095366d07bae812c38a24a88f07c197f5
100644
--- a/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
+++ b/src/tools/sssctl/sssctl_sifp.c
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
#include "util/util.h"
#include "tools/sssctl/sssctl.h"
-#define ERR_SSSD _("Check that SSSD is running and " \
- "the InfoPipe responder is enabled.\n")
+#define ERR_SSSD _("IFP Disabled: Please add the ifp service to the service" \
+ "list in sssd.conf and restart the service.\n")
Here
is a comment from the author of previous message.
05:26 < lslebodn> pbrezina: Do you have any coment to the patch
"SSSCTL: More helpful error message when
InfoPipe is disabled" ?
05:26 < lslebodn> becuase I plan to push it :-)
05:28 < pbrezina> lslebodn, I still think that the original message
is more accurate, but I don't oppose.
I tent to agree.
I would reserve the original message and wrote a "HINT" in next line.
Any objection for such compromise?
LS