On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 05:52:20PM +0200, Martin Basti wrote:
On 10/07/15 16:55, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 01:17:44PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>>While reading #2558 I noticed that there is a further request relating to
>>these patches - mbasti asks If there could be some mean how to send IPs of
>>all interfaces?
>>Is this a good idea in general?
>>I suppose I could implement it with some special value for 'dyndns_iface'
-
>>ideally the special value would contain characters prohibited to be part of
>>interface name if there are such...
>I would say this looks like a useful feature in general, but can you ask
>Martin why he needs this feature? I think the time has come for 1.13
>development to start turning into bug fixing more, so unless there is
>really some particular use-case, please move the ticket into 1.14.
>_______________________________________________
>sssd-devel mailing list
>sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
This is blocker for
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4249
Without this patch we cannot add dualstack and multihomed support to IPA
clients, because when IPA adds all IP and IPv6 addresses to DNS, then SSSD
just deletes all records and put there just one address.
I can see the argument for dualstack -- we shouldn't remove v6 addresses
if we're talking to the server over v4 and conversely. I suspect the
multi-homed use-case is a bit less important, right?
We want to support dualstack in IPA for long time. Several users wanted
dualstack, even multihomed support.
Is there a corresponding IPA ticket or some link to a freeipa-users
thread?
Please note I agree with the technical requirement, but there's limited
time, so we should prioritize.