On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 05:52:13PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:34:14AM -0500, Adam Litke wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:17:18AM -0400, Ayal Baron wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to discuss the following on today's call:
> >
> > 1. Gerrit vs. mailing list
Gerrit is an inhibiter for some contributors.
One approach to solve this improve gerrit:
- Gerrit should send the patch when it notified of a change. This may
attract more reviewers.
I'm happy to inform that Gal has sent a patch for this to upstream
gerrit:
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34861/
Add unified diff to newchange mail template.
- comments should be posted with their context
and for this one, too:
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34862/
- pick up a patch/comment from the mailing list
I hope we can fix another annoying behaviour of gerrit: a comment to a
change set says how many inline comments are there, but it does not tell
which comments are they (hopefully with a link to the comment).
What else would we want to talk about today?
- state of Adam's REST patches review
- Hunt Xu's ifconfig patch (very wanted, blocked on a missing unit test)
- Saggi's betterPopen
- ?