* Eyal Edri <eedri(a)redhat.com> [2012-07-18 11:59]:
> I'm in favor on doing it next monday.
> (not too healthy to do upgrades before the weekend...).
>
> We'll need to send email to rhev-devel + qe for an estimated downtime of 1 hour
for
gerrit.eng.lab.tlv.redhat.com.
>
Any update?
I've sent an update earlier today to infra that i'm planning to upgrade
gerrit to 2.4.2 coming sunday.
after a few days of a clean upgrade, I'll do the patched version of it.
> Eyal.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "Ryan Harper" <ryanh(a)us.ibm.com>
>> Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken(a)redhat.com>, "Adam Litke"
<agl(a)us.ibm.com>, "Anthony Liguori" <aliguori(a)us.ibm.com>,
>> "VDSM Project Development" <vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org>,
"Eyal Edri" <eedri(a)redhat.com>, "Attila Darazs"
>> <adarazs(a)redhat.com>, "Moran Goldboim"
<mgoldboi(a)redhat.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 7:48:01 PM
>> Subject: Re: [vdsm] minutes: today's call
>>
>> On 07/18/2012 06:24 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:
>>> * Itamar Heim <iheim(a)redhat.com> [2012-05-16 10:26]:
>>>> On 05/16/2012 06:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:43:57AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
>>>>>> * Dan Kenigsberg<danken(a)redhat.com> [2012-05-07 05:42]:
>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 05:52:13PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg
wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:34:14AM -0500, Adam Litke
wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:17:18AM -0400, Ayal Baron
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would like to discuss the following on
today's call:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1. Gerrit vs. mailing list
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gerrit is an inhibiter for some contributors.
>>>>>>>> One approach to solve this improve gerrit:
>>>>>>>> - Gerrit should send the patch when it notified of a
change.
>>>>>>>> This may
>>>>>>>> attract more reviewers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm happy to inform that Gal has sent a patch for this
to
>>>>>>> upstream
>>>>>>> gerrit:
>>>>>>>
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34861/
>>>>>>> Add unified diff to newchange mail template.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any eta on getting the gerrit notifications of changes to
>>>>>> include the
>>>>>> full patch in the email?
>>>>>
>>>>> You can +1 them in googlesource, maybe it helps ;-)
>>>>
>>>> indeed, please help push them upstream...
>>>>
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34861/
>>>>
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34862/
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm definitely happy to see notification on new posts and
>>>>>> changes; helps
>>>>>> me see what new activity is happening, but I'd really enjoy
>>>>>> seeing the
>>>>>> the patch series attached (via threading) as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Itamar, I know Red Hat hates to do it, but can we take these
>>>>> patches to
>>>>> ovirt's gerrit before they are accepted upstream?
>>>>
>>>> yes we can.
>>>> after i'll upgrade it to 2.3, which i prefer to do after i return
>>>> from PTO in case there are some issues with the upgrade.
>>>> so ETA end of the month for clean upgrade to 2.3, then after we
>>>> see
>>>> all is ok, let's say another week to upgrade to the version with
>>>> these patches.
>>>
>>> It's about 6 weeks later. Dan's been asking for more review in
>>> vdsm;
>>> I know that I'd be able to review quite a bit more if I can get
>>> patches
>>> via email instead of the webui.
>>>
>>> Can we get this enabled?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> eyal/attila - any ETA on testing gerrit 2.4 (.2 by now) so we can
>> upgrade to it?
>>
>>