I'm in favor on doing it next monday.
(not too healthy to do upgrades before the weekend...).
We'll need to send email to rhev-devel + qe for an estimated downtime of 1 hour for
gerrit.eng.lab.tlv.redhat.com.
Eyal.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Ryan Harper" <ryanh(a)us.ibm.com>
> Cc: "Dan Kenigsberg" <danken(a)redhat.com>, "Adam Litke"
<agl(a)us.ibm.com>, "Anthony Liguori" <aliguori(a)us.ibm.com>,
> "VDSM Project Development" <vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org>,
"Eyal Edri" <eedri(a)redhat.com>, "Attila Darazs"
> <adarazs(a)redhat.com>, "Moran Goldboim" <mgoldboi(a)redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 7:48:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [vdsm] minutes: today's call
>
> On 07/18/2012 06:24 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:
> > * Itamar Heim <iheim(a)redhat.com> [2012-05-16 10:26]:
> >> On 05/16/2012 06:11 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> >>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 09:43:57AM -0500, Ryan Harper wrote:
> >>>> * Dan Kenigsberg<danken(a)redhat.com> [2012-05-07 05:42]:
> >>>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 05:52:13PM +0300, Dan Kenigsberg
wrote:
> >>>>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 07:34:14AM -0500, Adam Litke
wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 04:17:18AM -0400, Ayal Baron
wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I would like to discuss the following on
today's call:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 1. Gerrit vs. mailing list
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Gerrit is an inhibiter for some contributors.
> >>>>>> One approach to solve this improve gerrit:
> >>>>>> - Gerrit should send the patch when it notified of a
change.
> >>>>>> This may
> >>>>>> attract more reviewers.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm happy to inform that Gal has sent a patch for this to
> >>>>> upstream
> >>>>> gerrit:
> >>>>>
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34861/
> >>>>> Add unified diff to newchange mail template.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Any eta on getting the gerrit notifications of changes to
> >>>> include the
> >>>> full patch in the email?
> >>>
> >>> You can +1 them in googlesource, maybe it helps ;-)
> >>
> >> indeed, please help push them upstream...
> >>
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34861/
> >>
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/#/c/34862/
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm definitely happy to see notification on new posts and
> >>>> changes; helps
> >>>> me see what new activity is happening, but I'd really enjoy
> >>>> seeing the
> >>>> the patch series attached (via threading) as well.
> >>>
> >>> Itamar, I know Red Hat hates to do it, but can we take these
> >>> patches to
> >>> ovirt's gerrit before they are accepted upstream?
> >>
> >> yes we can.
> >> after i'll upgrade it to 2.3, which i prefer to do after i return
> >> from PTO in case there are some issues with the upgrade.
> >> so ETA end of the month for clean upgrade to 2.3, then after we
> >> see
> >> all is ok, let's say another week to upgrade to the version with
> >> these patches.
> >
> > It's about 6 weeks later. Dan's been asking for more review in
> > vdsm;
> > I know that I'd be able to review quite a bit more if I can get
> > patches
> > via email instead of the webui.
> >
> > Can we get this enabled?
> >
> >
>
> eyal/attila - any ETA on testing gerrit 2.4 (.2 by now) so we can
> upgrade to it?
>
>
--
Ryan Harper
Software Engineer; Linux Technology Center
IBM Corp., Austin, Tx
ryanh(a)us.ibm.com