Boris can you help me to parse this ...
SL6 = Scientific Linux 6?
Yes, I work with SL6 alpha 4
And you're saying that Windows 7 is much faster on SL6 than on
Fedora 14?
Installation itself . Packages deployment phase is much faster on SL 6 ( alpha 4),
even if I don't pre-load viostor.sys ( option working only on SL 6 )
Are virtio-blk and virtio-net drivers installed in the Windows guest?
Yes.
Please, view for details :-
http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2011/01/08/set-up-rh-virtio-scsi-driver-...
XML profiles for F14 and SL6 will be sent to you a bit latter. I cannot reboot box right
now.
Boris.
--- On Fri, 1/14/11, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com> wrote:
From: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones(a)redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] Fedora Virt status
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets(a)yahoo.com>
Cc: virt(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, "Justin M. Forbes"
<jmforbes(a)linuxtx.org>, qemu-devel(a)nongnu.org
Date: Friday, January 14, 2011, 12:40 PM
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 08:27:17AM -0800, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
Windows 7 KVM install runs unbelievably fast on SL 6 ( alpha 3) vs
F14 with the
most recent libvirt stuff :
Boris can you help me to parse this ...
SL6 = Scientific Linux 6?
And you're saying that Windows 7 is much faster on SL6 than on Fedora 14?
P.S. It happens no matter of pre-install loading Virtio SCSI driver,
which is also possible only on SL6 via virtio-win.1.1.16.noarch.rpm.
Not sure what 'Virtio SCSI' is.
Are virtio-blk and virtio-net drivers installed in the Windows guest?
What does the libvirt XML for this guest look like (from both SL6 and
Fedora 14)?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/